Capability
46.7/100
field median 57.7
#147 of 217 ranked models
Qwen3.5 Plus
Released Mar 4, 2026 — see all recent releases
Decision reading
Qwen3.5 Plus scores 46.7 out of 100 and ranks #147 of 217. This profile shows 4 source-displayable benchmark rows; its strongest eligible category is Agentic at #69. API pricing is $0.4 input and $2.4 output per million tokens.
Data as of August 13, 2026 · How the score is built
Strongest published evidence
Agentic ranks #69. Particularly useful for coding agents, browser research, and computer-use workflows.
Validate before choosing
4 published rows leave some tracked benchmark slots empty. Independent runtime speed has not been measured.
Decision snapshot
Each value carries a field reference instead of floating alone. Markers compare this model with the current ranked and priced catalog; they are not absolute quality thresholds.
Price
$0.40input / $2.40 output
input median $1
blended $1.40
Speed
Not measured
field median 93 tok/s
Time to first token not measured
Context
1Mtokens
field median 200,000
Reported for this model; direct source link not stored
Capability shape
Each axis shows percentile within that category’s eligible cohort. The comparison outline is the median of the six nearest public-score peers; a collapsed vertex means the category is not rank-eligible.
Qwen3.5 Plus category percentile values
- Agentic47th percentile
- CodingNot eligible
- ReasoningNot eligible
- KnowledgeNot eligible
- MathNot eligible
- MultilingualNot eligible
- MultimodalNot eligible
- Instruction followingNot eligible
The dashed outline is median of 6 nearest peers.
Eligible category ranks
- Agentic#69/129
- CodingNot ranked
- ReasoningNot ranked
- KnowledgeNot ranked
- MathNot ranked
- MultilingualNot ranked
- MultimodalNot ranked
- Inst. FollowingNot ranked
Top decileTop quartileMid-fieldNot eligible
What it costs to get this score
Published API price against the public score. The x-axis uses a log scale; the dashed path marks models that are not beaten by a cheaper, higher-scoring option. Price uses average of published input and output rates.
The chart opens on the current model. Scroll horizontally to inspect the full price axis.
Current modelQwen3.5 Plus · 46.7 score · $1.40 blended per million tokens
Horizontal: blended price per million tokens, log scale · Vertical: public score
How much of this is verified
Coverage is split by category so a strong number never hides a thin evidence base. Verified means the row is tied to a published source; provisional rows remain visible but separate.
- Agentic1/1 verified
- Coding1/1 verified
- ReasoningNot measured
- KnowledgeNot measured
- Math2/2 verified
- MultilingualNot measured
- MultimodalNot measured
- Inst. FollowingNot measured
Verified sourceProvisionalNot measured
Spec sheet
Each documented value carries its source. Missing fields stay visible as not sourced or not published, rather than disappearing from the page.
- API model ID
- Not published
- Context window
- 1M
- Maximum output
- Not sourced yet
- Knowledge cutoff
- Not sourced yet
- Input modalities
- Not sourced yet
- Output modalities
- Not sourced yet
- Parameters
- Not disclosed by the provider
- Availability
- Not sourced yet
- Cloud regions
- Not tracked yet
- Lifecycle
- Current
- API capabilities
- Tool calling, structured outputs, and batch support are not tracked yet
- Prompt caching
- Not documented in the pricing record
- Self-host
- Weights are not published
- Rate limits
- Not tracked yet
Category score record
Scores and ranks appear only where published evidence can be displayed. The table keeps the score, weight, cohort, and evidence state together.
| Category | Score | Rank | Percentile | Weight | Benchmarks | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AgenticRank #69 of 129Percentile 47thWeight 22%1 benchmarkVerified | 47.8 | #69 of 129 | 47th | 22% | 1 benchmark | Verified |
| CodingWeight 20%1 benchmarkVerified | Score pending | Not ranked | Not available | 20% | 1 benchmark | Verified |
| ReasoningWeight 17%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 17% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
| KnowledgeWeight 12%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 12% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
| MathRank Not rankedWeight 5%2 benchmarksVerified | 39.5 | Not ranked | Not available | 5% | 2 benchmarks | Verified |
| MultilingualWeight 7%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 7% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
| MultimodalWeight 12%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 12% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
| Inst. FollowingWeight 5%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 5% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
Benchmark ledger
Coding opens by default. The marker compares each value with the best source-verified result in the catalog; provisional leaders do not set the reference. Expand the remaining categories for every published row.
Coding1 row
| Benchmark | Score | Versus best verified row | Gap | Weight | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vibe Code BenchVibe Code Bench v1.1 | Score15.74% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Claude Opus 4.7 · 71.00% | Gap55.3 behind | WeightDisplay only | Benchmark exact |
Agentic1 row
| Benchmark | Score | Versus best verified row | Gap | Weight | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JobBench | Score18.5% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Muse Spark 1.1 · 54.7% | Gap36.2 behind | WeightDisplay only | Benchmark exact |
Math2 rows
| Benchmark | Score | Versus best verified row | Gap | Weight | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)FrontierMath v2 Tiers 1-3 | Score21.034% | Versus best verified row Best verified: GPT-5.6 Sol · 89.000% | Gap68 behind | WeightWeighted 30% | Benchmark exact |
| FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)FrontierMath v2 Tier 4 | Score2.083% | Versus best verified row Best verified: GPT-5.6 Sol · 83.000% | Gap80.9 behind | WeightWeighted 10% | Benchmark exact |
Lineage
The sequence follows explicit supersedes links. Scores and prices remain blank when the corresponding public row or first-party rate is unavailable.
Mar 4, 2026 · you are here
Qwen3.5 PlusScore 46.7 · $0.4 / $2.4
Base entry
How to read this profile
The visual layer above carries the decisions. These notes preserve the model, ranking, coverage, and family context behind the numbers.
Qwen3.5 Plus ranks #147 of 217 on the public leaderboard with a score of 46.73/100. It does not yet have enough sourced coverage for a verified position.
Qwen3.5 Plus is a proprietary model with a 1M context window. It uses an explicit reasoning mode, which can improve complex problem solving while adding latency and token use.
Official first-party benchmark snapshot from the Qwen Agent DeepPlanning v1.1 leaderboard. BenchLM now tracks the published DeepPlanning score for the hosted Qwen3.5 Plus API tier while broader benchmark coverage remains sparse.
4 of 431 tracked benchmark slots currently have displayable evidence. Missing categories stay blank.
Its strongest eligible category is Agentic at #69. particularly useful for coding agents, browser research, and computer-use workflows.
Radar
Full release historyQwen3.5 Plus release history
Qwen3.5 Plus and Flash released
Alibaba · Model release
Source confirmed
Frequently asked questions
How does Qwen3.5 Plus perform overall in AI benchmarks?
Qwen3.5 Plus ranks #147 out of 217 models on the public BenchAlign leaderboard, with a score of 46.73/100. Its evidence status is Estimated, and this profile shows 4 source-displayable benchmark rows. The label describes evidence depth, not a provider quality claim; inspect category rows before choosing a workload.
Is Qwen3.5 Plus good for coding and programming?
Qwen3.5 Plus has source-displayable benchmark coverage for coding and programming, but the public category table does not assign it a rank there. The individual rows remain available for inspection. A missing category position means the evidence threshold was not met; it does not convert the model's unmeasured work into a zero.
Is Qwen3.5 Plus good for mathematics?
Qwen3.5 Plus has source-displayable benchmark coverage for mathematics, but the public category table does not assign it a rank there. The individual rows remain available for inspection. A missing category position means the evidence threshold was not met; it does not convert the model's unmeasured work into a zero.
Is Qwen3.5 Plus good for agentic tool use and computer tasks?
Qwen3.5 Plus ranks #69 out of 129 eligible models for agentic tool use and computer tasks, with a public category score of 47.8/100. Higher-ranked alternatives are available for workloads where this category decides the choice. Check the underlying rows before treating the aggregate as a workload guarantee.
Does Qwen3.5 Plus have full benchmark coverage on BenchLM?
No. Qwen3.5 Plus currently has 4 source-displayable rows across 431 tracked benchmark slots. The profile exposes published, non-generated evidence and leaves missing categories blank until an exact evaluation is available. Coverage describes how much was measured; it is not a penalty added to an individual benchmark result.
What is the context window size of Qwen3.5 Plus?
Qwen3.5 Plus has a reported context window of 1M in the exact-model catalog record. The value stays visible, but the profile marks its source link as unavailable instead of presenting it as directly documented. Maximum output length remains separate because providers often publish a different limit.
Last updated August 13, 2026. Runtime fields remain blank until a sourced snapshot exists.
Watch Qwen3.5 Plus in the weekly brief
Get one weekly email when material rank, price, availability, or benchmark evidence changes are worth revisiting.
Read a sample issueJoin 2,000+ readers.