Head-to-head comparison across 1benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
Command A+
32
GPT-5.4 Pro
91
Pick GPT-5.4 Pro if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Command A+ only becomes the better choice if you want the cheaper token bill.
Multimodal
+34.2 difference
Command A+
GPT-5.4 Pro
$2.5 / $10
$30 / $180
272 t/s
74 t/s
0.25s
151.79s
128K
1.05M
Pick GPT-5.4 Pro if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Command A+ only becomes the better choice if you want the cheaper token bill.
GPT-5.4 Pro is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 91 to 32. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
GPT-5.4 Pro's sharpest advantage is in multimodal & grounded, where it averages 94 against 59.8. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is MMMU-Pro, 63% to 94%.
GPT-5.4 Pro is also the more expensive model on tokens at $30.00 input / $180.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $2.50 input / $10.00 output per 1M tokens for Command A+. That is roughly 18.0x on output cost alone. GPT-5.4 Pro gives you the larger context window at 1.05M, compared with 128K for Command A+.
GPT-5.4 Pro is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 91 to 32. The biggest single separator in this matchup is MMMU-Pro, where the scores are 63% and 94%.
GPT-5.4 Pro has the edge for multimodal and grounded tasks in this comparison, averaging 94 versus 59.8. Inside this category, MMMU-Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.