DeepSeek-R1 vs Holo3-35B-A3B
Head-to-head comparison across 0benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
Verdict
Holo3-35B-A3B leads for most workloads.
Based on BenchLM composite scores, July 2026.
DeepSeek-R1
33
Holo3-35B-A3B
74
Benchmark data for DeepSeek-R1 and Holo3-35B-A3B is coming soon on BenchLM.
Category Radar
Head-to-Head by Category
Operational Comparison
DeepSeek-R1
Holo3-35B-A3B
$0.55 / $2.19
$null / $null
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
128K
64K
Quick Verdict
Benchmark data for DeepSeek-R1 and Holo3-35B-A3B is coming soon on BenchLM.
BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.
DeepSeek-R1 has the larger context window at 128K, compared with 64K for Holo3-35B-A3B.
Benchmark Deep Dive
Frequently Asked Questions (3)
Can I compare DeepSeek-R1 and Holo3-35B-A3B on BenchLM yet?
Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.
Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?
BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.
What data is available for DeepSeek-R1 and Holo3-35B-A3B today?
DeepSeek-R1: $0.55 input / $2.19 output per 1M tokens Holo3-35B-A3B: Pricing unavailable Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.
Self-host vs API cost
Estimates at 50,000 req/day · 1000 tokens/req average.
Related Comparisons
Explore More
The AI models change fast. We track them for you.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.