Skip to main content

Model comparison

DeepSeek V3.1 vs Grok 4

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 11 shared benchmark results across 5 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

53.64/100
Margin
6.8pts
winning →
60.42/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: DeepSeek V3.1 #95 (Supported); Grok 4 #50 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. DeepSeek V3.1 and Grok 4 share 11 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 1 result is unique to DeepSeek V3.1; 5 to Grok 4.

Updated July 20, 2026
Shared results
11
DeepSeek V3.1 only
1
Grok 4 only
5
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for DeepSeek V3.1 and Grok 4 is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 11 shared benchmark results across 5 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for DeepSeek V3.1 and Grok 4
CategoryDeepSeek V3.1ΔGrok 4
MathDeepSeek V3.1Not measuredMarginNo overlapGrok 415.3

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricDeepSeek V3.1Grok 4Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensDeepSeek V3.1$0 input / $0 outputGrok 4Not availableA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondDeepSeek V3.1Not availableGrok 454 tok/sA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenDeepSeek V3.1Not availableGrok 415.60 sA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensDeepSeek V3.1128KGrok 4128KListed context windows are equal.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1Grok 4Result
τ²-bench resultsSource 34.8%74.9%Grok 4 leads
Gert LabsSource 42.34%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1Grok 4Result
AA-SciCodeSource 36.7%45.7%Grok 4 leads
React Native EvalsSource 72.6%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1Grok 4Result
AA-LCRSource 45.0%68.0%Grok 4 leads
CritPtSource 0.0%2.0%Grok 4 leads
Knowledge
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1Grok 4Result
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 21.1%33.3%Grok 4 leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 73.5%87.7%Grok 4 leads
AA-HLESource 6.3%23.9%Grok 4 leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -41.1%3.8%Grok 4 leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 23.1%41.4%Grok 4 leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 83.5%64.2%Grok 4 leads
Math
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1Grok 4Result
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 19.655%Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)Source 2.083%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1Grok 4Result
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1155Not comparable
AA-MMMU-ProSource 68.8%Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1Grok 4Result
AA-IFBenchSource 37.8%53.7%Grok 4 leads
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare DeepSeek V3.1 and Grok 4 on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for DeepSeek V3.1 and Grok 4 today?

DeepSeek V3.1: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Grok 4: Pricing unavailable Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 20, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.