Skip to main content

Model comparison

DeepSeek V3.1 vs Inkling

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 9 shared benchmark results across 3 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

53.52/100
Margin
18.5pts
winning →
Thinking Machines Lab
72/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Verified leaderboard positions: DeepSeek V3.1 unranked; Inkling #17

BenchAlign evidence: DeepSeek V3.1 supported; Inkling not scored. Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. DeepSeek V3.1 and Inkling share 9 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 4 results are unique to DeepSeek V3.1; 23 to Inkling.

Updated July 16, 2026
Shared results
9
DeepSeek V3.1 only
4
Inkling only
23
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for DeepSeek V3.1 and Inkling is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 9 shared benchmark results across 3 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Inkling is priced at $1.87 input / $4.68 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for DeepSeek V3.1. Inkling has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 128K for DeepSeek V3.1.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for DeepSeek V3.1 and Inkling
CategoryDeepSeek V3.1ΔInkling
AgenticDeepSeek V3.1Not measuredMarginNo overlapInkling69.4
CodingDeepSeek V3.1Not measuredMarginNo overlapInkling68.6
KnowledgeDeepSeek V3.1Not measuredMarginNo overlapInkling51.7
MathDeepSeek V3.1Not measuredMarginNo overlapInkling97.1
MultimodalDeepSeek V3.1Not measuredMarginNo overlapInkling76.5
Inst. FollowingDeepSeek V3.1Not measuredMarginNo overlapInkling79.8

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricDeepSeek V3.1InklingComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensDeepSeek V3.1$0 input / $0 outputInkling$1.87 input / $4.68 outputDeepSeek V3.1 has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondDeepSeek V3.1Not availableInklingNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenDeepSeek V3.1Not availableInklingNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensDeepSeek V3.1128KInkling1MInkling lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1InklingResult
τ²-bench resultsSource 34.8%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 63.8%Not comparable
BrowseCompSource 77.1%Not comparable
MCP AtlasSource 74.1%Not comparable
Design Arena Agentic Web DevSource 1258Not comparable
AA Agentic IndexSource 32.3%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 36.9%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 1239Not comparable
AA BriefcaseSource 836Not comparable
AA Tau3 BankingSource 23.7%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1InklingResult
Terminal-Bench HardSource 24.2%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 36.7%46.1%Inkling leads
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 77.6%Not comparable
SWE-bench ProSource 54.3%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 63.8%Not comparable
AA Coding IndexSource 52.1%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1InklingResult
AA-LCRSource 45.0%63.3%Inkling leads
CritPtSource 0.0%5.4%Inkling leads
Knowledge
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1InklingResult
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 21.1%40.7%Inkling leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 73.5%87.2%Inkling leads
AA-HLESource 6.3%29.7%Inkling leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -41.1%2.1%Inkling leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 23.1%40.0%Inkling leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 83.5%63.1%Inkling leads
GPQASource 87.9%Not comparable
GPQA-DSource 87.9%Not comparable
HLESource 46%Not comparable
HLE w/o toolsSource 30%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1InklingResult
AIME26Source 97.1%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1InklingResult
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1157Not comparable
MMMU-ProSource 73.5%Not comparable
CharXivSource 82%Not comparable
CharXiv w/o toolsSource 78.1%Not comparable
AA-MMMU-ProSource 73.5%Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1InklingResult
AA-IFBenchSource 37.8%Not comparable
IFBenchSource 79.8%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare DeepSeek V3.1 and Inkling on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for DeepSeek V3.1 and Inkling today?

DeepSeek V3.1: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Inkling: $1.87 input / $4.68 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 16, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

A weekly brief for engineers and researchers covering new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.