Side-by-side benchmark comparison across knowledge, coding, math, and reasoning.
DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) is clearly ahead on the aggregate, 75 to 33. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
o1-pro gives you the larger context window at 200K, compared with 128K for DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking).
Pick DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) if you want the stronger benchmark profile. o1-pro only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority or you need the larger 200K context window.
DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking)
71.8
o1-pro
79
DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking)
85.8
o1-pro
86
DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) is ahead overall, 75 to 33. The biggest single separator in this matchup is GPQA, where the scores are 85 and 79.
o1-pro has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 79 versus 71.8. Inside this category, GPQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
o1-pro has the edge for math in this comparison, averaging 86 versus 85.8. Inside this category, AIME 2024 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.