Skip to main content

Model comparison

DeepSeek V3 vs Inkling

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 2 shared benchmark results across 2 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

DeepSeek
44.84/100
Margin
24.2pts
winning →
Thinking Machines Lab
69/100
2 category wins2 category wins

Verified leaderboard positions: DeepSeek V3 unranked; Inkling #17

BenchAlign evidence: DeepSeek V3 supported; Inkling not scored. Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. DeepSeek V3 and Inkling share 2 comparable benchmark results. 4 of 8 categories are comparable. 21 results are unique to DeepSeek V3; 14 to Inkling.

Updated July 15, 2026
Shared results
2
DeepSeek V3 only
21
Inkling only
14
Comparable categories
4 / 8

Pick Inkling if you want the stronger benchmark profile. DeepSeek V3 only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority or you want the cheaper token bill.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 2 shared benchmark results across 2 evidence categories; 4 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

Inkling is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 69 to 38. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

Inkling's sharpest advantage is in mathematics, where it averages 97.1 against 1.7. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is SWE-bench Verified, 42% to 77.6%. DeepSeek V3 does hit back in knowledge, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.

Inkling is also the more expensive model on tokens at $1.87 input / $4.68 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.27 input / $1.10 output per 1M tokens for DeepSeek V3. That is roughly 4.3x on output cost alone. Inkling is the reasoning model in the pair, while DeepSeek V3 is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use. Inkling gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 128K for DeepSeek V3.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for DeepSeek V3 and Inkling
CategoryDeepSeek V3ΔInkling
MathDeepSeek V31.7Margin 95.4Inkling97.1
CodingDeepSeek V338.9Margin 29.7Inkling68.6
KnowledgeDeepSeek V372.8Margin 21.1Inkling51.7
Inst. FollowingDeepSeek V386.1Margin 6.3Inkling79.8
AgenticDeepSeek V3Not measuredMarginNo overlapInkling69.4
MultimodalDeepSeek V3Not measuredMarginNo overlapInkling76.5

Decisive benchmark drivers

The largest measured benchmark gaps in this matchup, with exact reported values.

More
A · DeepSeek V3B · Inkling
  1. SWE-bench Verified

    Coding
    Source ↗
    A 42%B 77.6%
    Winner: InklingΔ 35.6
    SWE-bench Verified: DeepSeek V3 scored 42%; Inkling scored 77.6%. Inkling wins this benchmark.
  2. GPQA

    Knowledge
    Source ↗
    A 59.1%B 87.9%
    Winner: InklingΔ 28.8
    GPQA: DeepSeek V3 scored 59.1%; Inkling scored 87.9%. Inkling wins this benchmark.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricDeepSeek V3InklingComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensDeepSeek V3$0.27 input / $1.1 outputInkling$1.87 input / $4.68 outputDeepSeek V3 has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondDeepSeek V3Not availableInklingNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenDeepSeek V3Not availableInklingNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensDeepSeek V3128KInkling1MInkling lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3InklingResult
AA Agentic IndexSource 1.6%Not comparable
τ²-bench resultsSource 22.8%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 0.0%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 217Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 63.8%Not comparable
BrowseCompSource 77.1%Not comparable
MCP AtlasSource 74.1%Not comparable
Design Arena Agentic Web DevSource 1258Not comparable
CodingInkling wins
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3InklingResult
LiveCodeBenchSource 37.6%Not comparable
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 42%77.6%Inkling leads
AA Coding IndexSource 23.0%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench HardSource 6.8%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 35.4%Not comparable
SWE-bench ProSource 54.3%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 63.8%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3InklingResult
AA-LCRSource 29.0%Not comparable
CritPtSource 0.0%Not comparable
KnowledgeDeepSeek V3 wins
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3InklingResult
GPQASource 59.1%87.9%Inkling leads
MMLU-ProSource 75.9%Not comparable
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 14.2%Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 55.7%Not comparable
AA-HLESource 3.6%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -41.3%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 25.4%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 89.4%Not comparable
GPQA-DSource 87.9%Not comparable
HLESource 46%Not comparable
HLE w/o toolsSource 30%Not comparable
MathInkling wins
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3InklingResult
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 1.724%Not comparable
AIME26Source 97.1%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3InklingResult
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1154Not comparable
MMMU-ProSource 73.5%Not comparable
CharXivSource 82%Not comparable
CharXiv w/o toolsSource 78.1%Not comparable
Inst. FollowingDeepSeek V3 wins
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3InklingResult
IFEvalSource 86.1%Not comparable
AA-IFBenchSource 34.8%Not comparable
IFBenchSource 79.8%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (5)

Which is better, DeepSeek V3 or Inkling?

Inkling is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 69 to 38. The biggest single separator in this matchup is SWE-bench Verified, where the scores are 42% and 77.6%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, DeepSeek V3 or Inkling?

DeepSeek V3 has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 72.8 versus 51.7. Inside this category, GPQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, DeepSeek V3 or Inkling?

Inkling has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 68.6 versus 38.9. Inside this category, SWE-bench Verified is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for math, DeepSeek V3 or Inkling?

Inkling has the edge for math in this comparison, averaging 97.1 versus 1.7. DeepSeek V3 stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.

Which is better for instruction following, DeepSeek V3 or Inkling?

DeepSeek V3 has the edge for instruction following in this comparison, averaging 86.1 versus 79.8. Inkling stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.

Self-host vs API cost

Estimates at 50,000 req/day · 1000 tokens/req average.

DeepSeek V3
API / mo$1,028
Self-host / mo$18,221
Break-even1.2B/day
Inkling
API / mo$4,913
Self-host / moNot listed
Break-even
Proprietary model — self-hosting not applicable.
Model the full break-even

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 15, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

A weekly brief for engineers and researchers covering new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.