Model comparison
DeepSeekMath V2 vs Llama 4 Maverick
Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Public leaderboard positions: DeepSeekMath V2 #119 (Estimated); Llama 4 Maverick #191 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. DeepSeekMath V2 and Llama 4 Maverick share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 0 results are unique to DeepSeekMath V2; 18 to Llama 4 Maverick.
Updated July 21, 2026- Shared results
- 0
- DeepSeekMath V2 only
- 0
- Llama 4 Maverick only
- 18
- Comparable categories
- 0 / 8
Benchmark data for DeepSeekMath V2 and Llama 4 Maverick is coming soon on BenchLM.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
BenchLM does not have sourced benchmark coverage for DeepSeekMath V2 yet. This comparison is currently limited to metadata such as context window, reasoning mode, and pricing where available.
Llama 4 Maverick has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 128K for DeepSeekMath V2.
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | DeepSeekMath V2 | Llama 4 Maverick | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | DeepSeekMath V2$0 input / $0 output | Llama 4 Maverick$0 input / $0 output | Listed prices are equal. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | DeepSeekMath V2Not available | Llama 4 Maverick121 tok/s | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | DeepSeekMath V2Not available | Llama 4 Maverick0.95 s | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | DeepSeekMath V2128K | Llama 4 Maverick1M | Llama 4 Maverick lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic4 benchmarks
Coding2 benchmarks
Reasoning2 benchmarks
Knowledge6 benchmarks
| Benchmark | DeepSeekMath V2 | Llama 4 Maverick | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | — | 14.3% | Not comparable |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | — | 67.1% | Not comparable |
| AA-HLESource | — | 4.8% | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | — | -41.8% | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | — | 24.3% | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | — | 87.3% | Not comparable |
Math1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | DeepSeekMath V2 | Llama 4 Maverick | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source | — | 0.690% | Not comparable |
Multimodal2 benchmarks
Inst. Following1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | DeepSeekMath V2 | Llama 4 Maverick | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-IFBenchSource | — | 43.0% | Not comparable |
Frequently Asked Questions (3)
Can I compare DeepSeekMath V2 and Llama 4 Maverick on BenchLM yet?
Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.
Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?
BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.
What data is available for DeepSeekMath V2 and Llama 4 Maverick today?
DeepSeekMath V2: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Llama 4 Maverick: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.
Self-host vs API cost
Estimates at 50,000 req/day · 1000 tokens/req average.
Related Comparisons
Explore More
Choose a model with this week’s evidence
Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.
One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.