Model comparison
Exaone 4.0 32B vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Head-to-head evidence from 9 shared benchmark results across 3 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Public leaderboard positions: Exaone 4.0 32B #170 (Estimated); Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite unranked (Not scored). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. Exaone 4.0 32B and Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite share 9 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 4 results are unique to Exaone 4.0 32B; 12 to Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite.
Updated July 21, 2026- Shared results
- 9
- Exaone 4.0 32B only
- 4
- Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite only
- 12
- Comparable categories
- 0 / 8
Benchmark data for Exaone 4.0 32B and Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is coming soon on BenchLM.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 9 shared benchmark results across 3 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 128K for Exaone 4.0 32B.
Category breakdown
Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.
| Category | Exaone 4.0 32B | Δ | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agentic | Exaone 4.0 32BNot measured | MarginNo overlap | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite63.4 |
| Coding | Exaone 4.0 32BNot measured | MarginNo overlap | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite54.2 |
| Reasoning | Exaone 4.0 32BNot measured | MarginNo overlap | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite72.2 |
| Knowledge | Exaone 4.0 32B81.8 | MarginNo overlap | Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteNot measured |
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | Exaone 4.0 32B | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | Exaone 4.0 32BNot available | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite$0.3 input / $2.5 output | A complete price comparison is not available. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | Exaone 4.0 32BNot available | Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteNot available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | Exaone 4.0 32BNot available | Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteNot available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | Exaone 4.0 32B128K | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite1M | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic8 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Exaone 4.0 32B | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| τ²-bench resultsSource | 4.1% | — | Not comparable |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | — | 54% | Not comparable |
| OSWorld-VerifiedSource | — | 74% | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | — | 1140 | Not comparable |
| AA Agentic IndexSource | — | 26.8% | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | — | 32.0% | Not comparable |
| AA BriefcaseSource | — | 634 | Not comparable |
| AA Tau3 BankingSource | — | 16.5% | Not comparable |
Coding4 benchmarks
Reasoning3 benchmarks
Knowledge7 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Exaone 4.0 32B | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU-ProSource | 81.8% | — | Not comparable |
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | 6.0% | 36.5% | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite leads |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | 62.8% | 83.8% | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite leads |
| AA-HLESource | 4.9% | 17.5% | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite leads |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | -62.3% | 6.9% | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite leads |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | 10.4% | 30.3% | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite leads |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | 81.0% | 33.5% | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite leads |
Math1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Exaone 4.0 32B | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AIME 2025Source | 85.3% | — | Not comparable |
Multimodal1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Exaone 4.0 32B | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-MMMU-ProSource | — | 79.0% | Not comparable |
Inst. Following1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Exaone 4.0 32B | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-IFBenchSource | 33.5% | — | Not comparable |
Frequently Asked Questions (3)
Can I compare Exaone 4.0 32B and Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite on BenchLM yet?
Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.
Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?
BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.
What data is available for Exaone 4.0 32B and Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite today?
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: $0.30 input / $2.50 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.
Related Comparisons
Choose a model with this week’s evidence
Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.
One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.