Model comparison
Exaone 4.0 32B vs GLM-4.6
Head-to-head evidence from 11 shared benchmark results across 5 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Public leaderboard positions: Exaone 4.0 32B #170 (Estimated); GLM-4.6 #85 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. Exaone 4.0 32B and GLM-4.6 share 11 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 2 results are unique to Exaone 4.0 32B; 3 to GLM-4.6.
Updated July 23, 2026- Shared results
- 11
- Exaone 4.0 32B only
- 2
- GLM-4.6 only
- 3
- Comparable categories
- 0 / 8
Benchmark data for Exaone 4.0 32B and GLM-4.6 is coming soon on BenchLM.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 11 shared benchmark results across 5 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.
GLM-4.6 has the larger context window at 200K, compared with 128K for Exaone 4.0 32B.
Category breakdown
Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.
| Category | Exaone 4.0 32B | Δ | GLM-4.6 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Knowledge | Exaone 4.0 32B81.8 | MarginNo overlap | GLM-4.6Not measured |
| Math | Exaone 4.0 32BNot measured | MarginNo overlap | GLM-4.63.4 |
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | Exaone 4.0 32B | GLM-4.6 | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | Exaone 4.0 32BNot available | GLM-4.6Not available | A complete price comparison is not available. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | Exaone 4.0 32BNot available | GLM-4.6Not available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | Exaone 4.0 32BNot available | GLM-4.6Not available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | Exaone 4.0 32B128K | GLM-4.6200K | GLM-4.6 lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Exaone 4.0 32B | GLM-4.6 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| τ²-bench resultsSource | 4.1% | 76.9% | GLM-4.6 leads |
Coding2 benchmarks
Reasoning2 benchmarks
Knowledge7 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Exaone 4.0 32B | GLM-4.6 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU-ProSource | 81.8% | — | Not comparable |
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | 6.0% | 23.0% | GLM-4.6 leads |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | 62.8% | 63.2% | GLM-4.6 leads |
| AA-HLESource | 4.9% | 5.2% | GLM-4.6 leads |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | -62.3% | -31.6% | GLM-4.6 leads |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | 10.4% | 20.8% | GLM-4.6 leads |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | 81.0% | 66.1% | GLM-4.6 leads |
Math3 benchmarks
Inst. Following1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Exaone 4.0 32B | GLM-4.6 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-IFBenchSource | 33.5% | 36.7% | GLM-4.6 leads |
Frequently Asked Questions (2)
Can I compare Exaone 4.0 32B and GLM-4.6 on BenchLM yet?
Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.
Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?
BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.
Related Comparisons
Choose a model with this week’s evidence
Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.
One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.