Side-by-side benchmark comparison across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, and math workflows.
Exaone 4.0 32B
~83
Winner · 0/8 categoriesHolo2-4B
Coming soon
0/8 categoriesExaone 4.0 32B· Holo2-4B
Benchmark data for Exaone 4.0 32B and Holo2-4B is coming soon on BenchLM.
BenchLM does not have sourced benchmark coverage for Holo2-4B yet. This comparison is currently limited to metadata such as context window, reasoning mode, and pricing where available.
Holo2-4B has the larger context window at 262K, compared with 128K for Exaone 4.0 32B.
| Benchmark | Exaone 4.0 32B | Holo2-4B |
|---|---|---|
| Agentic | ||
| Coming soon | ||
| Coding | ||
| Coming soon | ||
| Multimodal & Grounded | ||
| Coming soon | ||
| Reasoning | ||
| Coming soon | ||
| Knowledge | ||
| MMLU-Pro | 81.8% | — |
| Instruction Following | ||
| Coming soon | ||
| Multilingual | ||
| Coming soon | ||
| Mathematics | ||
| AIME 2025 | 85.3% | — |
Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.
BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.
Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.