Skip to main content

Model comparison

Exaone 4.0 32B vs Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

No sourced benchmark result is currently shared by both models. This page therefore compares only the available metadata, pricing, and runtime rows; it does not name a quality winner.
LG AI Research
40.44/100
No comparison
1 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Exaone 4.0 32B #170 (Estimated); Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking unranked (Not scored). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Exaone 4.0 32B and Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking share 0 comparable benchmark results. 1 of 8 categories are comparable. 13 results are unique to Exaone 4.0 32B; 5 to Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking.

Updated July 23, 2026
Shared results
0
Exaone 4.0 32B only
13
Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking only
5
Comparable categories
1 / 8

Treat this as a split decision. Exaone 4.0 32B makes more sense if knowledge is the priority; Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking is the better fit if its strengths line up with your actual workload.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 1 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

Exaone 4.0 32B and Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking finish on the same BenchAlign overall score, so this is less about a single winner and more about where the edge shows up. The BenchAlign headline says tie; the benchmark table is where the real choice happens.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricExaone 4.0 32BMellum2-12B-A2.5B-ThinkingComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensExaone 4.0 32BNot availableMellum2-12B-A2.5B-ThinkingNot availableA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondExaone 4.0 32BNot availableMellum2-12B-A2.5B-ThinkingNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenExaone 4.0 32BNot availableMellum2-12B-A2.5B-ThinkingNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensExaone 4.0 32B128KMellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking128KListed context windows are equal.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkExaone 4.0 32BMellum2-12B-A2.5B-ThinkingResult
τ²-bench resultsSource 4.1%Not comparable
BFCL v4Source 45.6%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkExaone 4.0 32BMellum2-12B-A2.5B-ThinkingResult
AA-SciCodeSource 25.2%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkExaone 4.0 32BMellum2-12B-A2.5B-ThinkingResult
AA-LCRSource 8.0%Not comparable
CritPtSource 0.0%Not comparable
KnowledgeExaone 4.0 32B wins
BenchmarkExaone 4.0 32BMellum2-12B-A2.5B-ThinkingResult
MMLU-ProSource 81.8%Not comparable
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 6.0%Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 62.8%Not comparable
AA-HLESource 4.9%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -62.3%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 10.4%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 81.0%Not comparable
MMLU-ReduxSource 86.2%Not comparable
GPQASource 57.6%Not comparable
GPQA-DSource 57.6%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkExaone 4.0 32BMellum2-12B-A2.5B-ThinkingResult
AIME 2025Source 85.3%Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkExaone 4.0 32BMellum2-12B-A2.5B-ThinkingResult
AA-IFBenchSource 33.5%Not comparable
IFEvalSource 76.5%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (2)

Which is better, Exaone 4.0 32B or Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking?

Exaone 4.0 32B and Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking are tied on the BenchAlign overall score, so the right pick depends on which category matters most for your use case.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Exaone 4.0 32B or Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking?

Exaone 4.0 32B has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 81.8 versus 57.6. Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 23, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.