Head-to-head comparison across 2benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
Exaone 4.0 32B
65
MiMo-V2-Flash
61
Pick Exaone 4.0 32B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. MiMo-V2-Flash only becomes the better choice if mathematics is the priority or you need the larger 256K context window.
Knowledge
+2.7 difference
Math
+8.8 difference
Exaone 4.0 32B
MiMo-V2-Flash
N/A
$0 / $0
N/A
129 t/s
N/A
2.14s
128K
256K
Pick Exaone 4.0 32B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. MiMo-V2-Flash only becomes the better choice if mathematics is the priority or you need the larger 256K context window.
Exaone 4.0 32B is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 65 to 61. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
MiMo-V2-Flash gives you the larger context window at 256K, compared with 128K for Exaone 4.0 32B.
Exaone 4.0 32B is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 65 to 61. The biggest single separator in this matchup is AIME 2025, where the scores are 85.3% and 94.1%.
MiMo-V2-Flash has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 84.5 versus 81.8. Inside this category, MMLU-Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
MiMo-V2-Flash has the edge for math in this comparison, averaging 94.1 versus 85.3. Inside this category, AIME 2025 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.