Exaone 4.0 32B vs Moonshot v1

Side-by-side benchmark comparison across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, and math workflows.

Exaone 4.0 32B is clearly ahead on the aggregate, 83 to 47. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

Exaone 4.0 32B's sharpest advantage is in knowledge, where it averages 81.8 against 37. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is AIME 2025, 85.3% to 54%.

Exaone 4.0 32B is the reasoning model in the pair, while Moonshot v1 is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use.

Quick Verdict

Pick Exaone 4.0 32B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Moonshot v1 only becomes the better choice if you would rather avoid the extra latency and token burn of a reasoning model.

Agentic

Coming soon

Benchmark data for this category is coming soon.

Coding

Coming soon

Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.

Coming soon
HumanEval
45%
Coming soon
SWE-bench Verified
34%
Coming soon
LiveCodeBench
21%

Multimodal & Grounded

Coming soon

Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.

Coming soon
MMMU-Pro
49%
Coming soon
OfficeQA Pro
57%

Reasoning

Coming soon

Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.

Coming soon
MuSR
49%
Coming soon
BBH
73%
Coming soon
LongBench v2
58%
Coming soon
MRCRv2
56%

Knowledge

Exaone 4.0 32B

Exaone 4.0 32B

81.8

Moonshot v1

37

81.8%
MMLU-Pro
Coming soon
Coming soon
MMLU
53%
Coming soon
GPQA
52%
Coming soon
SuperGPQA
50%
Coming soon
HLE
5%
Coming soon
FrontierScience
49%
Coming soon
SimpleQA
51%

Instruction Following

Coming soon

Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.

Coming soon
IFEval
77%

Multilingual

Coming soon

Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.

Coming soon
MGSM
73%
Coming soon
MMLU-ProX
68%

Mathematics

Exaone 4.0 32B

Exaone 4.0 32B

85.3

Moonshot v1

57.8

85.3%
AIME 2025
54%
Coming soon
AIME 2023
53%
Coming soon
AIME 2024
55%
Coming soon
HMMT Feb 2023
49%
Coming soon
HMMT Feb 2024
51%
Coming soon
HMMT Feb 2025
50%
Coming soon
BRUMO 2025
52%
Coming soon
MATH-500
72%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Exaone 4.0 32B or Moonshot v1?

Exaone 4.0 32B is ahead overall, 83 to 47. The biggest single separator in this matchup is AIME 2025, where the scores are 85.3% and 54%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Exaone 4.0 32B or Moonshot v1?

Exaone 4.0 32B has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 81.8 versus 37. Moonshot v1 stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.

Which is better for math, Exaone 4.0 32B or Moonshot v1?

Exaone 4.0 32B has the edge for math in this comparison, averaging 85.3 versus 57.8. Inside this category, AIME 2025 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Last updated: March 18, 2026

Weekly LLM Benchmark Digest

Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.