Exaone 4.0 32B vs Muse Spark 1.1
Head-to-head comparison across 1benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
Verdict
Muse Spark 1.1 leads for most workloads.
Based on BenchLM composite scores, July 2026.
Exaone 4.0 32B
51
Muse Spark 1.1
78
Pick Muse Spark 1.1 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Exaone 4.0 32B only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority.
Category Radar
Head-to-Head by Category
Category Breakdown
| Benchmark | Exaone 4.0 32B | Δ | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Knowledge | 81.8 | ← 19.7 | 62.1 |
| Agentic | — | — | 80.4 |
| Coding | — | — | 61.5 |
| Multimodal | — | — | 88.4 |
Operational Comparison
Exaone 4.0 32B
Muse Spark 1.1
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
128K
1M
Quick Verdict
Pick Muse Spark 1.1 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Exaone 4.0 32B only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority.
Muse Spark 1.1 is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 78 to 51. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
Muse Spark 1.1 gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 128K for Exaone 4.0 32B.
Benchmark Deep Dive
Frequently Asked Questions (2)
Which is better, Exaone 4.0 32B or Muse Spark 1.1?
Muse Spark 1.1 is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 78 to 51.
Which is better for knowledge tasks, Exaone 4.0 32B or Muse Spark 1.1?
Exaone 4.0 32B has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 81.8 versus 62.1. Muse Spark 1.1 stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.
Related Comparisons
The AI models change fast. We track them for you.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.