Exaone 4.0 32B vs Nemotron 3 Super 100B

Side-by-side benchmark comparison across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, and math workflows.

Exaone 4.0 32B is clearly ahead on the aggregate, 83 to 60. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

Exaone 4.0 32B's sharpest advantage is in knowledge, where it averages 81.8 against 53.4. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is AIME 2025, 85.3% to 66%.

Exaone 4.0 32B is the reasoning model in the pair, while Nemotron 3 Super 100B is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use. Nemotron 3 Super 100B gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 128K for Exaone 4.0 32B.

Quick Verdict

Pick Exaone 4.0 32B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Nemotron 3 Super 100B only becomes the better choice if you need the larger 1M context window or you would rather avoid the extra latency and token burn of a reasoning model.

Agentic

Coming soon

Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.

Coming soon
Terminal-Bench 2.0
56%
Coming soon
BrowseComp
61%
Coming soon
OSWorld-Verified
54%

Coding

Coming soon

Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.

Coming soon
HumanEval
57%
Coming soon
SWE-bench Verified
44%
Coming soon
LiveCodeBench
38%
Coming soon
SWE-bench Pro
44%

Multimodal & Grounded

Coming soon

Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.

Coming soon
MMMU-Pro
55%
Coming soon
OfficeQA Pro
67%

Reasoning

Coming soon

Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.

Coming soon
MuSR
60%
Coming soon
BBH
83%
Coming soon
LongBench v2
75%
Coming soon
MRCRv2
75%

Knowledge

Exaone 4.0 32B

Exaone 4.0 32B

81.8

Nemotron 3 Super 100B

53.4

81.8%
MMLU-Pro
72%
Coming soon
MMLU
65%
Coming soon
GPQA
64%
Coming soon
SuperGPQA
62%
Coming soon
HLE
13%
Coming soon
FrontierScience
63%
Coming soon
SimpleQA
62%

Instruction Following

Coming soon

Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.

Coming soon
IFEval
84%

Multilingual

Coming soon

Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.

Coming soon
MGSM
84%
Coming soon
MMLU-ProX
77%

Mathematics

Exaone 4.0 32B

Exaone 4.0 32B

85.3

Nemotron 3 Super 100B

69.6

85.3%
AIME 2025
66%
Coming soon
AIME 2023
65%
Coming soon
AIME 2024
67%
Coming soon
HMMT Feb 2023
61%
Coming soon
HMMT Feb 2024
63%
Coming soon
HMMT Feb 2025
62%
Coming soon
BRUMO 2025
64%
Coming soon
MATH-500
83%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Exaone 4.0 32B or Nemotron 3 Super 100B?

Exaone 4.0 32B is ahead overall, 83 to 60. The biggest single separator in this matchup is AIME 2025, where the scores are 85.3% and 66%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Exaone 4.0 32B or Nemotron 3 Super 100B?

Exaone 4.0 32B has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 81.8 versus 53.4. Inside this category, MMLU-Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for math, Exaone 4.0 32B or Nemotron 3 Super 100B?

Exaone 4.0 32B has the edge for math in this comparison, averaging 85.3 versus 69.6. Inside this category, AIME 2025 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Last updated: March 18, 2026

Weekly LLM Benchmark Digest

Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.