Skip to main content

Model comparison

Exaone 4.0 32B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 13 shared benchmark results across 5 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

LG AI Research
40.26/100
Margin
19.7pts
winning →
60/100
1 category wins0 category wins

Verified leaderboard positions: Exaone 4.0 32B unranked; Nemotron 3 Ultra #24

BenchAlign evidence: Exaone 4.0 32B estimated; Nemotron 3 Ultra not scored. Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Exaone 4.0 32B and Nemotron 3 Ultra share 13 comparable benchmark results. 1 of 8 categories are comparable. 1 result is unique to Exaone 4.0 32B; 26 to Nemotron 3 Ultra.

Updated July 16, 2026
Shared results
13
Exaone 4.0 32B only
1
Nemotron 3 Ultra only
26
Comparable categories
1 / 8

Pick Nemotron 3 Ultra if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Exaone 4.0 32B only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 13 shared benchmark results across 5 evidence categories; 1 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

Nemotron 3 Ultra is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 60 to 51. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

Nemotron 3 Ultra gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 128K for Exaone 4.0 32B.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for Exaone 4.0 32B and Nemotron 3 Ultra
CategoryExaone 4.0 32BΔNemotron 3 Ultra
KnowledgeExaone 4.0 32B81.8Margin 27.6Nemotron 3 Ultra54.2
AgenticExaone 4.0 32BNot measuredMarginNo overlapNemotron 3 Ultra51.3
CodingExaone 4.0 32BNot measuredMarginNo overlapNemotron 3 Ultra58.3
ReasoningExaone 4.0 32BNot measuredMarginNo overlapNemotron 3 Ultra61.9
MultilingualExaone 4.0 32BNot measuredMarginNo overlapNemotron 3 Ultra83.0
Inst. FollowingExaone 4.0 32BNot measuredMarginNo overlapNemotron 3 Ultra81.7

Decisive benchmark drivers

The largest measured benchmark gaps in this matchup, with exact reported values.

More
A · Exaone 4.0 32BB · Nemotron 3 Ultra
  1. MMLU-Pro

    Knowledge
    Source ↗
    A 81.8%B 86.8%
    Winner: Nemotron 3 UltraΔ 5
    MMLU-Pro: Exaone 4.0 32B scored 81.8%; Nemotron 3 Ultra scored 86.8%. Nemotron 3 Ultra wins this benchmark.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricExaone 4.0 32BNemotron 3 UltraComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensExaone 4.0 32BNot availableNemotron 3 Ultra$0 input / $0 outputA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondExaone 4.0 32BNot availableNemotron 3 UltraNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenExaone 4.0 32BNot availableNemotron 3 UltraNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensExaone 4.0 32B128KNemotron 3 Ultra1MNemotron 3 Ultra lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkExaone 4.0 32BNemotron 3 UltraResult
τ²-bench resultsSource 4.1%83.3%Nemotron 3 Ultra leads
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 56.4%Not comparable
PinchBenchSource 90.0%Not comparable
BrowseCompSource 44.4%Not comparable
τ³-bench resultsSource 70.9%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 33.2%Not comparable
HLE w/ toolsSource 37.4%Not comparable
AA Agentic IndexSource 27.4%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 1164Not comparable
AA BriefcaseSource 870Not comparable
AA EnterpriseOps-GymSource 28.9%Not comparable
AA Harvey LABSource 3.3%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkExaone 4.0 32BNemotron 3 UltraResult
Terminal-Bench HardSource 1.5%36.4%Nemotron 3 Ultra leads
AA-SciCodeSource 25.2%39.9%Nemotron 3 Ultra leads
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 71.9%Not comparable
SWE MultilingualSource 67.7%Not comparable
LiveCodeBench v6Source 89.0%Not comparable
SciCodeSource 44.6%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 56.4%Not comparable
AA Coding IndexSource 49.3%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkExaone 4.0 32BNemotron 3 UltraResult
AA-LCRSource 8.0%67.0%Nemotron 3 Ultra leads
CritPtSource 0.0%3.1%Nemotron 3 Ultra leads
LongBench v2Source 61.9%Not comparable
KnowledgeExaone 4.0 32B wins
BenchmarkExaone 4.0 32BNemotron 3 UltraResult
MMLU-ProSource 81.8%86.8%Nemotron 3 Ultra leads
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 6.0%37.8%Nemotron 3 Ultra leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 62.8%86.7%Nemotron 3 Ultra leads
AA-HLESource 4.9%26.6%Nemotron 3 Ultra leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -62.3%-0.8%Nemotron 3 Ultra leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 10.4%21.6%Nemotron 3 Ultra leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 81.0%28.5%Nemotron 3 Ultra leads
GPQASource 87%Not comparable
GPQA-DSource 87.0%Not comparable
HLESource 26.7%Not comparable
HLE w/o toolsSource 26.7%Not comparable
AA Openness IndexSource 83.3%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkExaone 4.0 32BNemotron 3 UltraResult
AIME 2025Source 85.3%Not comparable
Multilingual
BenchmarkExaone 4.0 32BNemotron 3 UltraResult
MMLU-ProXSource 83%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkExaone 4.0 32BNemotron 3 UltraResult
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1132Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkExaone 4.0 32BNemotron 3 UltraResult
AA-IFBenchSource 33.5%81.4%Nemotron 3 Ultra leads
IFBenchSource 81.7%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (2)

Which is better, Exaone 4.0 32B or Nemotron 3 Ultra?

Nemotron 3 Ultra is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 60 to 51. The biggest single separator in this matchup is MMLU-Pro, where the scores are 81.8% and 86.8%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Exaone 4.0 32B or Nemotron 3 Ultra?

Exaone 4.0 32B has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 81.8 versus 54.2. Inside this category, AA-Omniscience Index is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 16, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

A weekly brief for engineers and researchers covering new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.