Exaone 4.0 32B vs Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)

Side-by-side benchmark comparison across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, and math workflows.

Exaone 4.0 32B is clearly ahead on the aggregate, 83 to 52. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

Exaone 4.0 32B's sharpest advantage is in knowledge, where it averages 81.8 against 50. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is AIME 2025, 85.3% to 92.3%.

Quick Verdict

Pick Exaone 4.0 32B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning) only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.

Agentic

Coming soon

Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.

Coming soon
Terminal-Bench 2.0
47%
Coming soon
BrowseComp
48%
Coming soon
OSWorld-Verified
43%

Coding

Coming soon

Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.

Coming soon
HumanEval
32%
Coming soon
SWE-bench Verified
16%
Coming soon
LiveCodeBench
74.1%
Coming soon
SWE-bench Pro
29%

Multimodal & Grounded

Coming soon

Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.

Coming soon
MMMU-Pro
38%
Coming soon
OfficeQA Pro
47%

Reasoning

Coming soon

Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.

Coming soon
MuSR
36%
Coming soon
BBH
63%
Coming soon
LongBench v2
58%
Coming soon
MRCRv2
58%

Knowledge

Exaone 4.0 32B

Exaone 4.0 32B

81.8

Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)

50

81.8%
MMLU-Pro
84.4%
Coming soon
MMLU
40%
Coming soon
GPQA
81.1%
Coming soon
SuperGPQA
64.9%
Coming soon
HLE
6%
Coming soon
FrontierScience
42%
Coming soon
SimpleQA
38%

Instruction Following

Coming soon

Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.

Coming soon
IFEval
87.8%

Multilingual

Coming soon

Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.

Coming soon
MGSM
62%
Coming soon
MMLU-ProX
81%

Mathematics

Exaone 4.0 32B

Exaone 4.0 32B

85.3

Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)

65.6

85.3%
AIME 2025
92.3%
Coming soon
AIME 2023
40%
Coming soon
AIME 2024
42%
Coming soon
HMMT Feb 2023
36%
Coming soon
HMMT Feb 2024
38%
Coming soon
HMMT Feb 2025
37%
Coming soon
BRUMO 2025
39%
Coming soon
MATH-500
60%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Exaone 4.0 32B or Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)?

Exaone 4.0 32B is ahead overall, 83 to 52. The biggest single separator in this matchup is AIME 2025, where the scores are 85.3% and 92.3%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Exaone 4.0 32B or Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)?

Exaone 4.0 32B has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 81.8 versus 50. Inside this category, MMLU-Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for math, Exaone 4.0 32B or Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)?

Exaone 4.0 32B has the edge for math in this comparison, averaging 85.3 versus 65.6. Inside this category, AIME 2025 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Last updated: March 18, 2026

Weekly LLM Benchmark Digest

Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.