Model comparison
Exaone 4.0 32B vs Soofi S 30B-A3B
Head-to-head evidence from 1 shared benchmark result across 1 category. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
Evidence parity. Exaone 4.0 32B and Soofi S 30B-A3B share 1 comparable benchmark result. 1 of 8 categories are comparable. 13 results are unique to Exaone 4.0 32B; 7 to Soofi S 30B-A3B.
Updated July 15, 2026- Shared results
- 1
- Exaone 4.0 32B only
- 13
- Soofi S 30B-A3B only
- 7
- Comparable categories
- 1 / 8
Pick Exaone 4.0 32B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Soofi S 30B-A3B only becomes the better choice if you need the larger 1M context window or you would rather avoid the extra latency and token burn of a reasoning model.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 1 shared benchmark result across 1 evidence category; 1 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
Exaone 4.0 32B is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 51 to 45. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
Exaone 4.0 32B's sharpest advantage is in knowledge, where it averages 81.8 against 49.9. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is MMLU-Pro, 81.8% to 51.4%.
Exaone 4.0 32B is the reasoning model in the pair, while Soofi S 30B-A3B is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use. Soofi S 30B-A3B gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 128K for Exaone 4.0 32B.
Category breakdown
Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.
| Category | Exaone 4.0 32B | Δ | Soofi S 30B-A3B |
|---|---|---|---|
| Knowledge | Exaone 4.0 32B81.8 | Margin← 31.9 | Soofi S 30B-A3B49.9 |
Decisive benchmark drivers
The largest measured benchmark gaps in this matchup, with exact reported values.
More
- Source ↗
MMLU-Pro
KnowledgeA 81.8%B 51.4%Winner: Exaone 4.0 32BΔ 30.4MMLU-Pro: Exaone 4.0 32B scored 81.8%; Soofi S 30B-A3B scored 51.4%. Exaone 4.0 32B wins this benchmark.
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | Exaone 4.0 32B | Soofi S 30B-A3B | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | Exaone 4.0 32BNot available | Soofi S 30B-A3B$0 input / $0 output | A complete price comparison is not available. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | Exaone 4.0 32BNot available | Soofi S 30B-A3BNot available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | Exaone 4.0 32BNot available | Soofi S 30B-A3BNot available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | Exaone 4.0 32B128K | Soofi S 30B-A3B1M | Soofi S 30B-A3B lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Exaone 4.0 32B | Soofi S 30B-A3B | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| τ²-bench resultsSource | 4.1% | — | Not comparable |
Coding3 benchmarks
Reasoning4 benchmarks
KnowledgeExaone 4.0 32B wins10 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Exaone 4.0 32B | Soofi S 30B-A3B | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU-ProSource | 81.8% | 51.4% | Exaone 4.0 32B leads |
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | 6.0% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | 62.8% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-HLESource | 4.9% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | -62.3% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | 10.4% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | 81.0% | — | Not comparable |
| GPQASource | — | 43.4% | Not comparable |
| GPQA-DSource | — | 43.4% | Not comparable |
| AGIEvalSource | — | 66.9% | Not comparable |
Math2 benchmarks
Inst. Following1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Exaone 4.0 32B | Soofi S 30B-A3B | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-IFBenchSource | 33.5% | — | Not comparable |
Frequently Asked Questions (2)
Which is better, Exaone 4.0 32B or Soofi S 30B-A3B?
Exaone 4.0 32B is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 51 to 45. The biggest single separator in this matchup is MMLU-Pro, where the scores are 81.8% and 51.4%.
Which is better for knowledge tasks, Exaone 4.0 32B or Soofi S 30B-A3B?
Exaone 4.0 32B has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 81.8 versus 49.9. Inside this category, MMLU-Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Related Comparisons
The AI models change fast. We track them for you.
A weekly brief for engineers and researchers covering new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.