Skip to main content

Model comparison

Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Grok 4

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 4 shared benchmark results across 2 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

21.78/100
Margin
38.6pts
winning →
60.42/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Gemini 1.0 Pro #193 (Supported); Grok 4 #50 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Gemini 1.0 Pro and Grok 4 share 4 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 0 results are unique to Gemini 1.0 Pro; 12 to Grok 4.

Updated July 20, 2026
Shared results
4
Gemini 1.0 Pro only
0
Grok 4 only
12
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Gemini 1.0 Pro and Grok 4 is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 4 shared benchmark results across 2 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Grok 4 has the larger context window at 128K, compared with 32K for Gemini 1.0 Pro.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for Gemini 1.0 Pro and Grok 4
CategoryGemini 1.0 ProΔGrok 4
MathGemini 1.0 ProNot measuredMarginNo overlapGrok 415.3

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGemini 1.0 ProGrok 4Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGemini 1.0 ProNot availableGrok 4Not availableA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondGemini 1.0 ProNot availableGrok 454 tok/sA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGemini 1.0 ProNot availableGrok 415.60 sA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGemini 1.0 Pro32KGrok 4128KGrok 4 lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGrok 4Result
τ²-bench resultsSource 74.9%Not comparable
Gert LabsSource 42.34%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGrok 4Result
AA-SciCodeSource 11.7%45.7%Grok 4 leads
React Native EvalsSource 72.6%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGrok 4Result
AA-LCRSource 68.0%Not comparable
CritPtSource 2.0%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGrok 4Result
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 3.1%33.3%Grok 4 leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 27.7%87.7%Grok 4 leads
AA-HLESource 4.6%23.9%Grok 4 leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource 3.8%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 41.4%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 64.2%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGrok 4Result
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 19.655%Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)Source 2.083%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGrok 4Result
AA-MMMU-ProSource 68.8%Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGrok 4Result
AA-IFBenchSource 53.7%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Gemini 1.0 Pro and Grok 4 on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Gemini 1.0 Pro and Grok 4 today?

Gemini 1.0 Pro: Pricing unavailable Grok 4: Pricing unavailable Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 20, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.