Model comparison
Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B
Head-to-head evidence from 12 shared benchmark results across 6 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Public leaderboard positions: Gemini 2.5 Flash #134 (Supported); Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B #159 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. Gemini 2.5 Flash and Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B share 12 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 3 results are unique to Gemini 2.5 Flash; 17 to Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B.
Updated July 27, 2026- Shared results
- 12
- Gemini 2.5 Flash only
- 3
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B only
- 17
- Comparable categories
- 0 / 8
Benchmark data for Gemini 2.5 Flash and Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B is coming soon on BenchLM.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 12 shared benchmark results across 6 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.
Gemini 2.5 Flash is priced at $0.30 input / $2.50 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B. Gemini 2.5 Flash has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 256K for Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B.
Category breakdown
Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.
| Category | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Δ | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | Gemini 2.5 FlashNot measured | MarginNo overlap | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B32.0 |
| Knowledge | Gemini 2.5 FlashNot measured | MarginNo overlap | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B76.3 |
| Math | Gemini 2.5 Flash4.7 | MarginNo overlap | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BNot measured |
| Multimodal | Gemini 2.5 FlashNot measured | MarginNo overlap | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B76.3 |
| Inst. Following | Gemini 2.5 FlashNot measured | MarginNo overlap | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B74.2 |
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | Gemini 2.5 Flash$0.3 input / $2.5 output | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B$0 input / $0 output | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B has the lower combined listed price. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | Gemini 2.5 Flash221 tok/s | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BNot available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | Gemini 2.5 Flash0.50 s | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BNot available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | Gemini 2.5 Flash1M | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B256K | Gemini 2.5 Flash lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic4 benchmarks
Coding3 benchmarks
Reasoning2 benchmarks
Knowledge9 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | 14.1% | 14.9% | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B leads |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | 68.3% | 46.9% | Gemini 2.5 Flash leads |
| AA-HLESource | 5.1% | 5.3% | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B leads |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | -42.0% | -56.0% | Gemini 2.5 Flash leads |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | 26.5% | 14.8% | Gemini 2.5 Flash leads |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | 93.3% | 83.1% | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B leads |
| MMLU-ProSource | — | 77.3% | Not comparable |
| GPQASource | — | 72.2% | Not comparable |
| GPQA-DSource | — | 72.2% | Not comparable |
Math3 benchmarks
Multimodal9 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-MMMU-ProSource | 65.5% | 53.2% | Gemini 2.5 Flash leads |
| Design Arena WebsiteSource | 1140 | — | Not comparable |
| MMMUSource | — | 70.8% | Not comparable |
| MMLongBench-DocSource | — | 57.5% | Not comparable |
| CharXivSource | — | 76.3% | Not comparable |
| ScreenSpot ProSource | — | 57.8% | Not comparable |
| Video-MME (w/o subtitle)Source | — | 72.2% | Not comparable |
| AI2D_TESTSource | — | 88.5% | Not comparable |
| RefCOCO (avg)Source | — | 90.5% | Not comparable |
Frequently Asked Questions (3)
Can I compare Gemini 2.5 Flash and Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B on BenchLM yet?
Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.
Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?
BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.
What data is available for Gemini 2.5 Flash and Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B today?
Gemini 2.5 Flash: $0.30 input / $2.50 output per 1M tokens Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.
Related Comparisons
Explore More
Know when it’s worth switching models
The model to choose, the cheaper alternative, and the release we would wait on.
One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.