Model profile
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Evidence coverage
15 of 321 tracked benchmarks are published. 2 are verified and 13 provisional. 7 of 8 categories are measured.
- Published / tracked
- 15 / 321
- Verified
- 2
- Provisional
- 13
- Categories with evidence
- 7 / 8
Evidence by category
- Agentic1 benchmarkReported
- Coding1 benchmarkReported
- Reasoning2 benchmarksReported
- Knowledge6 benchmarksReported
- Math2 benchmarksVerified
- Multilingual0 benchmarksNot measured
- Multimodal2 benchmarksReported
- Inst. Following1 benchmarkReported
Gemini 2.5 Flash ranks #130 out of 200 models on the public leaderboard with an overall score of 48.09/100. It also ranks #66 out of 99 on the verified leaderboard. While not a frontier model, it offers specific advantages depending on the use case.
Gemini 2.5 Flash is a proprietary model with a 1M token context window. It processes queries without explicit chain-of-thought reasoning, offering faster response times and lower token usage.
This profile currently has 15 of 321 tracked benchmarks. BenchLM only exposes non-generated benchmark rows publicly, so missing categories stay blank until a sourced evaluation is available.
Peer position
Exact provisional scores and ranks for the closest listed peers. A score can appear before a model clears the evidence threshold for a rank, so equal scores can have different rank states.
Range 47.7–48.33
- o3-proOpenAICompare#12748.33o3-pro is #127 with a score of 48.33.
- Qwen3 MaxAlibabaCompare#12848.16Qwen3 Max is #128 with a score of 48.16.
- o1OpenAICompare#12948.1o1 is #129 with a score of 48.1.
- Gemini 2.5 FlashCurrent modelGoogle#13048.09Gemini 2.5 Flash is #130 with a score of 48.09.
- o3OpenAICompare#13147.89o3 is #131 with a score of 47.89.
- Claude 3.5 SonnetAnthropicCompare#13247.74Claude 3.5 Sonnet is #132 with a score of 47.74.
- GLM-4.5-AirZ.AICompare#13347.7GLM-4.5-Air is #133 with a score of 47.7.
Category percentile
More
Relative position among models eligible for each sourced category. A higher percentile means a stronger position within that category's ranked cohort; 100 is highest.
Category evidence
Scores and ranks appear only where this model has published benchmark evidence. Categories without displayable source records remain not measured.
| Category | Score | Rank | Percentile | Weight | Benchmarks | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AgenticRank Not rankedWeight 22%1 benchmarkReported | 46.9 | Not ranked | Not available | 22% | 1 benchmark | Reported |
| CodingRank Not rankedWeight 20%1 benchmarkReported | 20.3 | Not ranked | Not available | 20% | 1 benchmark | Reported |
| ReasoningRank Not rankedWeight 17%2 benchmarksReported | 68.0 | Not ranked | Not available | 17% | 2 benchmarks | Reported |
| KnowledgeRank Not rankedWeight 12%6 benchmarksReported | 31.7 | Not ranked | Not available | 12% | 6 benchmarks | Reported |
| MathRank Not rankedWeight 5%2 benchmarksVerified | 29.1 | Not ranked | Not available | 5% | 2 benchmarks | Verified |
| MultilingualWeight 7%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 7% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
| MultimodalRank Not rankedWeight 12%2 benchmarksReported | 67.8 | Not ranked | Not available | 12% | 2 benchmarks | Reported |
| Inst. FollowingRank Not rankedWeight 5%1 benchmarkReported | 79.0 | Not ranked | Not available | 5% | 1 benchmark | Reported |
Chatbot Arena performance
Scroll horizontally to inspect confidence intervals and vote counts.
| View | Elo | Confidence interval | Votes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Text Overall | 1410 | ±2.5 | 124,363 |
| Coding | 1424 | ±4.4 | 25,883 |
| Math | 1406 | ±6.8 | 7,863 |
| Instruction Following | 1401 | ±3.9 | 33,899 |
| Creative Writing | 1397 | ±5.1 | 17,309 |
| Multi-turn | 1404 | ±4.7 | 21,634 |
| Hard Prompts | 1420 | ±3.2 | 63,782 |
| Hard Prompts (English) | 1418 | ±4.0 | 32,134 |
| Longer Query | 1418 | ±4.1 | 31,868 |
Benchmark Details
Rows below have a displayable published verification record. Each source link and provenance note remains in the page HTML while its category is closed. Source-unverified manual rows and generated rows stay hidden.
Agentic1 benchmark
τ²-Bench Tool-Agent-User Evaluation
Coding1 benchmark
Artificial Analysis SciCode
Reasoning2 benchmarks
Artificial Analysis Long Context Reasoning
Critical Physics Tasks
Knowledge6 benchmarks
Artificial Analysis GPQA Diamond
Artificial Analysis Humanity's Last Exam
Artificial Analysis Omniscience Index
Artificial Analysis Omniscience Accuracy
Artificial Analysis Omniscience Hallucination Rate
Math2 benchmarks
FrontierMath v2 Tiers 1-3
FrontierMath v2 Tier 4
Multimodal2 benchmarks
Artificial Analysis MMMU-Pro
Design Arena Website Elo
Inst. Following1 benchmark
Artificial Analysis IFBench
Frequently Asked Questions
How does Gemini 2.5 Flash perform overall in AI benchmarks?
Gemini 2.5 Flash has 15 published benchmark scores on BenchLM, but it does not yet have enough non-generated coverage to receive a global overall rank.
Is Gemini 2.5 Flash good for knowledge and understanding?
Gemini 2.5 Flash has visible benchmark coverage in knowledge and understanding, but BenchLM does not currently assign it a global category rank there.
Is Gemini 2.5 Flash good for coding and programming?
Gemini 2.5 Flash has visible benchmark coverage in coding and programming, but BenchLM does not currently assign it a global category rank there.
Is Gemini 2.5 Flash good for mathematics?
Gemini 2.5 Flash has visible benchmark coverage in mathematics, but BenchLM does not currently assign it a global category rank there.
Is Gemini 2.5 Flash good for reasoning and logic?
Gemini 2.5 Flash has visible benchmark coverage in reasoning and logic, but BenchLM does not currently assign it a global category rank there.
Is Gemini 2.5 Flash good for agentic tool use and computer tasks?
Gemini 2.5 Flash has visible benchmark coverage in agentic tool use and computer tasks, but BenchLM does not currently assign it a global category rank there.
Is Gemini 2.5 Flash good for multimodal and grounded tasks?
Gemini 2.5 Flash has visible benchmark coverage in multimodal and grounded tasks, but BenchLM does not currently assign it a global category rank there.
Is Gemini 2.5 Flash good for instruction following?
Gemini 2.5 Flash has visible benchmark coverage in instruction following, but BenchLM does not currently assign it a global category rank there.
Does Gemini 2.5 Flash have full benchmark coverage on BenchLM?
Not yet. Gemini 2.5 Flash currently has 15 published benchmark scores out of the 321 benchmarks BenchLM tracks. BenchLM only exposes non-generated public benchmark rows, so missing categories stay blank until a sourced evaluation is available.
What is the context window size of Gemini 2.5 Flash?
Gemini 2.5 Flash has a published context window of 1M, which determines how much text it can process in a single interaction.
Related Resources
Choose with this week’s evidence
Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, new releases, pricing changes, and the evidence behind them.
Free. One email per week.