Model comparison
Gemini 2.5 Pro vs GPT-5 mini
Head-to-head evidence from 1 shared benchmark result across 1 category. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Public leaderboard positions: Gemini 2.5 Pro #70 (Supported); GPT-5 mini #153 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. Gemini 2.5 Pro and GPT-5 mini share 1 comparable benchmark result. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 23 results are unique to Gemini 2.5 Pro; 0 to GPT-5 mini.
Updated July 22, 2026- Shared results
- 1
- Gemini 2.5 Pro only
- 23
- GPT-5 mini only
- 0
- Comparable categories
- 0 / 8
Benchmark data for Gemini 2.5 Pro and GPT-5 mini is coming soon on BenchLM.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 1 shared benchmark result across 1 evidence category; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.
Gemini 2.5 Pro is priced at $1.25 input / $10.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.25 input / $2.00 output per 1M tokens for GPT-5 mini. Gemini 2.5 Pro has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 128K for GPT-5 mini.
Category breakdown
Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.
| Category | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Δ | GPT-5 mini |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | Gemini 2.5 Pro63.8 | MarginNo overlap | GPT-5 miniNot measured |
| Knowledge | Gemini 2.5 Pro27.4 | MarginNo overlap | GPT-5 miniNot measured |
| Math | Gemini 2.5 Pro11.6 | MarginNo overlap | GPT-5 miniNot measured |
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | Gemini 2.5 Pro | GPT-5 mini | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | Gemini 2.5 Pro$1.25 input / $10 output | GPT-5 mini$0.25 input / $2 output | GPT-5 mini has the lower combined listed price. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | Gemini 2.5 Pro117 tok/s | GPT-5 mini86 tok/s | Gemini 2.5 Pro has the higher measured throughput. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | Gemini 2.5 Pro21.19 s | GPT-5 mini65.32 s | Gemini 2.5 Pro reaches the first token sooner. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | Gemini 2.5 Pro1M | GPT-5 mini128K | Gemini 2.5 Pro lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic5 benchmarks
Coding4 benchmarks
Reasoning2 benchmarks
Knowledge8 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | GPT-5 mini | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQASource | 83% | — | Not comparable |
| HLESource | 18.8% | — | Not comparable |
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | 25.8% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | 84.4% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-HLESource | 21.1% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | -14.3% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | 39.0% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | 87.4% | — | Not comparable |
Math2 benchmarks
Multimodal2 benchmarks
Inst. Following1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | GPT-5 mini | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-IFBenchSource | 48.7% | — | Not comparable |
Frequently Asked Questions (3)
Can I compare Gemini 2.5 Pro and GPT-5 mini on BenchLM yet?
Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.
Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?
BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.
What data is available for Gemini 2.5 Pro and GPT-5 mini today?
Gemini 2.5 Pro: $1.25 input / $10.00 output per 1M tokens GPT-5 mini: $0.25 input / $2.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.
Related Comparisons
Explore More
Choose a model with this week’s evidence
Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.
One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.