Skip to main content

Model comparison

Gemini 2.5 Pro vs LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 12 shared benchmark results across 6 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

57.25/100
No comparison
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Gemini 2.5 Pro #70 (Supported); LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract unranked (Not scored). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Gemini 2.5 Pro and LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract share 12 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 12 results are unique to Gemini 2.5 Pro; 3 to LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract.

Updated July 23, 2026
Shared results
12
Gemini 2.5 Pro only
12
LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract only
3
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Gemini 2.5 Pro and LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 12 shared benchmark results across 6 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Gemini 2.5 Pro has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 128K for LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for Gemini 2.5 Pro and LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract
CategoryGemini 2.5 ProΔLFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract
CodingGemini 2.5 Pro63.8MarginNo overlapLFM2.5-VL-1.6B-ExtractNot measured
KnowledgeGemini 2.5 Pro27.4MarginNo overlapLFM2.5-VL-1.6B-ExtractNot measured
MathGemini 2.5 Pro11.6MarginNo overlapLFM2.5-VL-1.6B-ExtractNot measured

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGemini 2.5 ProLFM2.5-VL-1.6B-ExtractComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGemini 2.5 Pro$1.25 input / $10 outputLFM2.5-VL-1.6B-ExtractNot availableA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondGemini 2.5 Pro117 tok/sLFM2.5-VL-1.6B-ExtractNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGemini 2.5 Pro21.19 sLFM2.5-VL-1.6B-ExtractNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGemini 2.5 Pro1MLFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract128KGemini 2.5 Pro lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProLFM2.5-VL-1.6B-ExtractResult
AA Agentic IndexSource 7.1%Not comparable
τ²-bench resultsSource 54.1%8.5%Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
Gert LabsSource 42.01%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 8.3%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 665Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProLFM2.5-VL-1.6B-ExtractResult
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 63.8%Not comparable
Vibe Code BenchSource 0.40%Not comparable
AA Coding IndexSource 33.3%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 42.8%3.0%Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
Reasoning
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProLFM2.5-VL-1.6B-ExtractResult
AA-LCRSource 66.0%0.0%Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
CritPtSource 2.6%0.0%Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
Knowledge
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProLFM2.5-VL-1.6B-ExtractResult
GPQASource 83%Not comparable
HLESource 18.8%Not comparable
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 25.8%1.0%Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 84.4%28.9%Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
AA-HLESource 21.1%5.1%Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -14.3%-83.9%Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 39.0%5.2%Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 87.4%94.0%Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
Math
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProLFM2.5-VL-1.6B-ExtractResult
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 14.138%Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)Source 4.167%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProLFM2.5-VL-1.6B-ExtractResult
AA-MMMU-ProSource 74.9%26.5%Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1197Not comparable
Liquid Extract JSON ValiditySource 99.6%Not comparable
Liquid Extract F1Source 99.6%Not comparable
Liquid Extract VLM JudgeSource 90.6%Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProLFM2.5-VL-1.6B-ExtractResult
AA-IFBenchSource 48.7%33.1%Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Gemini 2.5 Pro and LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Gemini 2.5 Pro and LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract today?

Gemini 2.5 Pro: $1.25 input / $10.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 23, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.