Head-to-head comparison across 1benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
Gemini 2.5 Pro
67
LFM2.5-VL-450M
33
Pick Gemini 2.5 Pro if you want the stronger benchmark profile. LFM2.5-VL-450M only becomes the better choice if you want the cheaper token bill.
Knowledge
+19.2 difference
Gemini 2.5 Pro
LFM2.5-VL-450M
$1.25 / $5
$0 / $0
117 t/s
N/A
21.19s
N/A
1M
128K
Pick Gemini 2.5 Pro if you want the stronger benchmark profile. LFM2.5-VL-450M only becomes the better choice if you want the cheaper token bill.
Gemini 2.5 Pro is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 67 to 33. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
Gemini 2.5 Pro's sharpest advantage is in knowledge, where it averages 40.8 against 21.6. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is GPQA, 83% to 25.7%.
Gemini 2.5 Pro is also the more expensive model on tokens at $1.25 input / $5.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for LFM2.5-VL-450M. That is roughly Infinityx on output cost alone. Gemini 2.5 Pro gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 128K for LFM2.5-VL-450M.
Gemini 2.5 Pro is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 67 to 33. The biggest single separator in this matchup is GPQA, where the scores are 83% and 25.7%.
Gemini 2.5 Pro has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 40.8 versus 21.6. Inside this category, GPQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.