Skip to main content

Model comparison

Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 1 shared benchmark result across 1 category. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

57.25/100
No comparison
0 category wins1 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Gemini 2.5 Pro #70 (Supported); Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct unranked (Not scored). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Gemini 2.5 Pro and Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct share 1 comparable benchmark result. 1 of 8 categories are comparable. 23 results are unique to Gemini 2.5 Pro; 4 to Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct.

Updated July 23, 2026
Shared results
1
Gemini 2.5 Pro only
23
Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct only
4
Comparable categories
1 / 8

Treat this as a split decision. Gemini 2.5 Pro makes more sense if you need the larger 1M context window; Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct is the better fit if knowledge is the priority.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 1 shared benchmark result across 1 evidence category; 1 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

Gemini 2.5 Pro and Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct finish on the same BenchAlign overall score, so this is less about a single winner and more about where the edge shows up. The BenchAlign headline says tie; the benchmark table is where the real choice happens.

Gemini 2.5 Pro gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 128K for Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for Gemini 2.5 Pro and Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct
CategoryGemini 2.5 ProΔMellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct
KnowledgeGemini 2.5 Pro27.4Margin 13.5Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct40.9
CodingGemini 2.5 Pro63.8MarginNo overlapMellum2-12B-A2.5B-InstructNot measured
MathGemini 2.5 Pro11.6MarginNo overlapMellum2-12B-A2.5B-InstructNot measured
Inst. FollowingGemini 2.5 ProNot measuredMarginNo overlapMellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct75.8

Decisive benchmark drivers

The largest measured benchmark gaps in this matchup, with exact reported values.

More
A · Gemini 2.5 ProB · Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct
  1. GPQA

    Knowledge
    Source ↗
    A 83%B 40.9%
    Winner: Gemini 2.5 ProΔ 42.1
    GPQA: Gemini 2.5 Pro scored 83%; Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct scored 40.9%. Gemini 2.5 Pro wins this benchmark.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGemini 2.5 ProMellum2-12B-A2.5B-InstructComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGemini 2.5 Pro$1.25 input / $10 outputMellum2-12B-A2.5B-InstructNot availableA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondGemini 2.5 Pro117 tok/sMellum2-12B-A2.5B-InstructNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGemini 2.5 Pro21.19 sMellum2-12B-A2.5B-InstructNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGemini 2.5 Pro1MMellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct128KGemini 2.5 Pro lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProMellum2-12B-A2.5B-InstructResult
AA Agentic IndexSource 7.1%Not comparable
τ²-bench resultsSource 54.1%Not comparable
Gert LabsSource 42.01%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 8.3%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 665Not comparable
BFCL v4Source 44.2%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProMellum2-12B-A2.5B-InstructResult
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 63.8%Not comparable
Vibe Code BenchSource 0.40%Not comparable
AA Coding IndexSource 33.3%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 42.8%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProMellum2-12B-A2.5B-InstructResult
AA-LCRSource 66.0%Not comparable
CritPtSource 2.6%Not comparable
KnowledgeMellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct wins
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProMellum2-12B-A2.5B-InstructResult
GPQASource 83%40.9%Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
HLESource 18.8%Not comparable
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 25.8%Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 84.4%Not comparable
AA-HLESource 21.1%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -14.3%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 39.0%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 87.4%Not comparable
MMLU-ReduxSource 78.1%Not comparable
GPQA-DSource 40.9%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProMellum2-12B-A2.5B-InstructResult
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 14.138%Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)Source 4.167%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProMellum2-12B-A2.5B-InstructResult
AA-MMMU-ProSource 74.9%Not comparable
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1197Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProMellum2-12B-A2.5B-InstructResult
AA-IFBenchSource 48.7%Not comparable
IFEvalSource 75.8%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (2)

Which is better, Gemini 2.5 Pro or Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct?

Gemini 2.5 Pro and Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct are tied on the BenchAlign overall score, so the right pick depends on which category matters most for your use case.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Gemini 2.5 Pro or Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct?

Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 40.9 versus 27.4. Inside this category, GPQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 23, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.