Skip to main content

Model comparison

Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 15 shared benchmark results across 5 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

57.25/100
Margin
4.3pts
← winning
52.94/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Gemini 2.5 Pro #70 (Supported); Nemotron 3 Nano 30B #98 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Gemini 2.5 Pro and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B share 15 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 9 results are unique to Gemini 2.5 Pro; 0 to Nemotron 3 Nano 30B.

Updated July 20, 2026
Shared results
15
Gemini 2.5 Pro only
9
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B only
0
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Gemini 2.5 Pro and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 15 shared benchmark results across 5 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Gemini 2.5 Pro is priced at $1.25 input / $10.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Nemotron 3 Nano 30B. Gemini 2.5 Pro has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 32K for Nemotron 3 Nano 30B.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for Gemini 2.5 Pro and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B
CategoryGemini 2.5 ProΔNemotron 3 Nano 30B
CodingGemini 2.5 Pro63.8MarginNo overlapNemotron 3 Nano 30BNot measured
KnowledgeGemini 2.5 Pro27.4MarginNo overlapNemotron 3 Nano 30BNot measured
MathGemini 2.5 Pro11.6MarginNo overlapNemotron 3 Nano 30BNot measured

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGemini 2.5 ProNemotron 3 Nano 30BComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGemini 2.5 Pro$1.25 input / $10 outputNemotron 3 Nano 30B$0 input / $0 outputNemotron 3 Nano 30B has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondGemini 2.5 Pro117 tok/sNemotron 3 Nano 30B152 tok/sNemotron 3 Nano 30B has the higher measured throughput.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGemini 2.5 Pro21.19 sNemotron 3 Nano 30B1.90 sNemotron 3 Nano 30B reaches the first token sooner.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGemini 2.5 Pro1MNemotron 3 Nano 30B32KGemini 2.5 Pro lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProNemotron 3 Nano 30BResult
AA Agentic IndexSource 7.1%2.0%Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
τ²-bench resultsSource 54.1%40.9%Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
Gert LabsSource 42.01%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 8.3%0.0%Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
GDPval-AASource 665484Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
Coding
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProNemotron 3 Nano 30BResult
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 63.8%Not comparable
Vibe Code BenchSource 0.40%Not comparable
AA Coding IndexSource 33.3%14.4%Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
AA-SciCodeSource 42.8%29.6%Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
Reasoning
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProNemotron 3 Nano 30BResult
AA-LCRSource 66.0%33.7%Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
CritPtSource 2.6%0.9%Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
Knowledge
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProNemotron 3 Nano 30BResult
GPQASource 83%Not comparable
HLESource 18.8%Not comparable
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 25.8%14.2%Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 84.4%75.7%Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
AA-HLESource 21.1%10.2%Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -14.3%-51.6%Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 39.0%17.1%Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 87.4%82.9%Nemotron 3 Nano 30B leads
Math
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProNemotron 3 Nano 30BResult
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 14.138%Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)Source 4.167%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProNemotron 3 Nano 30BResult
AA-MMMU-ProSource 74.9%Not comparable
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1199Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProNemotron 3 Nano 30BResult
AA-IFBenchSource 48.7%71.1%Nemotron 3 Nano 30B leads
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Gemini 2.5 Pro and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Gemini 2.5 Pro and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B today?

Gemini 2.5 Pro: $1.25 input / $10.00 output per 1M tokens Nemotron 3 Nano 30B: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 20, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.