Model comparison
Gemini 2.5 Pro vs o4-mini (high)
Head-to-head evidence from 2 shared benchmark results across 1 category. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Public leaderboard positions: Gemini 2.5 Pro #70 (Supported); o4-mini (high) #118 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. Gemini 2.5 Pro and o4-mini (high) share 2 comparable benchmark results. 1 of 8 categories are comparable. 22 results are unique to Gemini 2.5 Pro; 0 to o4-mini (high).
Updated July 22, 2026- Shared results
- 2
- Gemini 2.5 Pro only
- 22
- o4-mini (high) only
- 0
- Comparable categories
- 1 / 8
Pick Gemini 2.5 Pro if you want the stronger benchmark profile. o4-mini (high) only becomes the better choice if mathematics is the priority or you want the stronger reasoning-first profile.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 2 shared benchmark results across 1 evidence category; 1 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
Gemini 2.5 Pro is clearly ahead on the BenchAlign aggregate, 57.25 to 49.98. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
o4-mini (high) is the reasoning model in the pair, while Gemini 2.5 Pro is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use. Gemini 2.5 Pro gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 200K for o4-mini (high).
Category breakdown
Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.
| Category | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Δ | o4-mini (high) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Math | Gemini 2.5 Pro11.6 | Margin→ 8.6 | o4-mini (high)20.2 |
| Coding | Gemini 2.5 Pro63.8 | MarginNo overlap | o4-mini (high)Not measured |
| Knowledge | Gemini 2.5 Pro27.4 | MarginNo overlap | o4-mini (high)Not measured |
Decisive benchmark drivers
The largest measured benchmark gaps in this matchup, with exact reported values.
More
- Source ↗
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)
MathA 14.138%B 24.828%Winner: o4-mini (high)Δ 10.7FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3): Gemini 2.5 Pro scored 14.138%; o4-mini (high) scored 24.828%. o4-mini (high) wins this benchmark. - Source ↗
FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)
MathA 4.167%B 6.250%Winner: o4-mini (high)Δ 2.1FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4): Gemini 2.5 Pro scored 4.167%; o4-mini (high) scored 6.250%. o4-mini (high) wins this benchmark.
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | Gemini 2.5 Pro | o4-mini (high) | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | Gemini 2.5 Pro$1.25 input / $10 output | o4-mini (high)Not available | A complete price comparison is not available. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | Gemini 2.5 Pro117 tok/s | o4-mini (high)161 tok/s | o4-mini (high) has the higher measured throughput. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | Gemini 2.5 Pro21.19 s | o4-mini (high)21.94 s | Gemini 2.5 Pro reaches the first token sooner. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | Gemini 2.5 Pro1M | o4-mini (high)200K | Gemini 2.5 Pro lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic5 benchmarks
Coding4 benchmarks
Reasoning2 benchmarks
Knowledge8 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | o4-mini (high) | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQASource | 83% | — | Not comparable |
| HLESource | 18.8% | — | Not comparable |
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | 25.8% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | 84.4% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-HLESource | 21.1% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | -14.3% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | 39.0% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | 87.4% | — | Not comparable |
Matho4-mini (high) wins2 benchmarks
Multimodal2 benchmarks
Inst. Following1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | o4-mini (high) | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-IFBenchSource | 48.7% | — | Not comparable |
Frequently Asked Questions (2)
Which is better, Gemini 2.5 Pro or o4-mini (high)?
Gemini 2.5 Pro is ahead on BenchLM's BenchAlign leaderboard, 57.25 to 49.98. The biggest single separator in this matchup is FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3), where the scores are 14.138% and 24.828%.
Which is better for math, Gemini 2.5 Pro or o4-mini (high)?
o4-mini (high) has the edge for math in this comparison, averaging 20.2 versus 11.6. Inside this category, FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3) is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Related Comparisons
Explore More
Choose a model with this week’s evidence
Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.
One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.