Skip to main content

Model comparison

Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Soofi S 30B-A3B

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 1 shared benchmark result across 1 category. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

60/100
Margin
15.0pts
← winning
Soofi Project
45/100
0 category wins1 category wins

Evidence parity. Gemini 2.5 Pro and Soofi S 30B-A3B share 1 comparable benchmark result. 1 of 8 categories are comparable. 24 results are unique to Gemini 2.5 Pro; 7 to Soofi S 30B-A3B.

Updated July 15, 2026
Shared results
1
Gemini 2.5 Pro only
24
Soofi S 30B-A3B only
7
Comparable categories
1 / 8

Pick Gemini 2.5 Pro if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Soofi S 30B-A3B only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority or you want the cheaper token bill.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 1 shared benchmark result across 1 evidence category; 1 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

Gemini 2.5 Pro is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 60 to 45. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

Gemini 2.5 Pro is also the more expensive model on tokens at $1.25 input / $10.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Soofi S 30B-A3B. That is roughly Infinityx on output cost alone.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for Gemini 2.5 Pro and Soofi S 30B-A3B
CategoryGemini 2.5 ProΔSoofi S 30B-A3B
KnowledgeGemini 2.5 Pro27.5Margin 22.4Soofi S 30B-A3B49.9
CodingGemini 2.5 Pro63.8MarginNo overlapSoofi S 30B-A3BNot measured
MathGemini 2.5 Pro11.6MarginNo overlapSoofi S 30B-A3BNot measured

Decisive benchmark drivers

The largest measured benchmark gaps in this matchup, with exact reported values.

More
A · Gemini 2.5 ProB · Soofi S 30B-A3B
  1. GPQA

    Knowledge
    Source ↗
    A 83%B 43.4%
    Winner: Gemini 2.5 ProΔ 39.6
    GPQA: Gemini 2.5 Pro scored 83%; Soofi S 30B-A3B scored 43.4%. Gemini 2.5 Pro wins this benchmark.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGemini 2.5 ProSoofi S 30B-A3BComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGemini 2.5 Pro$1.25 input / $10 outputSoofi S 30B-A3B$0 input / $0 outputSoofi S 30B-A3B has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondGemini 2.5 Pro117 tok/sSoofi S 30B-A3BNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGemini 2.5 Pro21.19 sSoofi S 30B-A3BNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGemini 2.5 Pro1MSoofi S 30B-A3B1MListed context windows are equal.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProSoofi S 30B-A3BResult
AA Agentic IndexSource 7.1%Not comparable
τ²-bench resultsSource 54.1%Not comparable
Gert LabsSource 42.01%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 8.3%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 665Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProSoofi S 30B-A3BResult
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 63.8%Not comparable
Vibe Code BenchSource 0.40%Not comparable
AA Coding IndexSource 33.3%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench HardSource 26.5%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 42.8%Not comparable
HumanEvalSource 73.8%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProSoofi S 30B-A3BResult
AA-LCRSource 66.0%Not comparable
CritPtSource 2.6%Not comparable
BBHSource 78.8%Not comparable
DROPSource 66.5%Not comparable
KnowledgeSoofi S 30B-A3B wins
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProSoofi S 30B-A3BResult
GPQASource 83%43.4%Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
HLESource 18.8%Not comparable
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 25.8%Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 84.4%Not comparable
AA-HLESource 21.1%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -14.3%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 39.0%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 87.4%Not comparable
GPQA-DSource 43.4%Not comparable
MMLU-ProSource 51.4%Not comparable
AGIEvalSource 66.9%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProSoofi S 30B-A3BResult
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 14.138%Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)Source 4.167%Not comparable
GSM8KSource 86.1%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProSoofi S 30B-A3BResult
AA-MMMU-ProSource 74.9%Not comparable
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1201Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProSoofi S 30B-A3BResult
AA-IFBenchSource 48.7%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (2)

Which is better, Gemini 2.5 Pro or Soofi S 30B-A3B?

Gemini 2.5 Pro is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 60 to 45. The biggest single separator in this matchup is GPQA, where the scores are 83% and 43.4%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Gemini 2.5 Pro or Soofi S 30B-A3B?

Soofi S 30B-A3B has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 49.9 versus 27.5. Inside this category, GPQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 15, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

A weekly brief for engineers and researchers covering new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.