Skip to main content

Model comparison

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite vs LFM2.5-8B-A1B

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 12 shared benchmark results across 5 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

50.56/100
Margin
9.3pts
← winning
41.25/100
0 category wins0 category wins

BenchAlign evidence: Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite supported; LFM2.5-8B-A1B estimated. Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite and LFM2.5-8B-A1B share 12 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 9 results are unique to Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite; 6 to LFM2.5-8B-A1B.

Updated July 16, 2026
Shared results
12
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite only
9
LFM2.5-8B-A1B only
6
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite and LFM2.5-8B-A1B is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 12 shared benchmark results across 5 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is priced at $0.25 input / $1.50 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for LFM2.5-8B-A1B. Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 128K for LFM2.5-8B-A1B.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite and LFM2.5-8B-A1B
CategoryGemini 3.1 Flash-LiteΔLFM2.5-8B-A1B
MathGemini 3.1 Flash-LiteNot measuredMarginNo overlapLFM2.5-8B-A1B50.0
MultimodalGemini 3.1 Flash-Lite73.2MarginNo overlapLFM2.5-8B-A1BNot measured
Inst. FollowingGemini 3.1 Flash-LiteNot measuredMarginNo overlapLFM2.5-8B-A1B68.8

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGemini 3.1 Flash-LiteLFM2.5-8B-A1BComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGemini 3.1 Flash-Lite$0.25 input / $1.5 outputLFM2.5-8B-A1B$0 input / $0 outputLFM2.5-8B-A1B has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondGemini 3.1 Flash-Lite205 tok/sLFM2.5-8B-A1BNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGemini 3.1 Flash-Lite7.50 sLFM2.5-8B-A1BNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGemini 3.1 Flash-Lite1MLFM2.5-8B-A1B128KGemini 3.1 Flash-Lite lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash-LiteLFM2.5-8B-A1BResult
AA Agentic IndexSource 6.2%Not comparable
APEX-Agents-AASource 12.2%Not comparable
τ²-bench resultsSource 31.3%16.1%Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite leads
GDPval-AASource 7.1%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 642Not comparable
Gert LabsSource 38.46%Not comparable
BFCL v4Source 49.7%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash-LiteLFM2.5-8B-A1BResult
Vibe Code BenchSource 0.00%Not comparable
AA Coding IndexSource 34.7%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench HardSource 24.2%4.5%Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite leads
AA-SciCodeSource 41.9%7.8%Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite leads
Reasoning
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash-LiteLFM2.5-8B-A1BResult
AA-LCRSource 65.3%0.0%Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite leads
CritPtSource 1.1%0.0%Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite leads
Knowledge
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash-LiteLFM2.5-8B-A1BResult
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 25.0%8.3%Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 82.2%51.3%Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite leads
AA-HLESource 16.2%6.9%Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -15.5%-33.3%Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 36.4%9.4%Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 81.6%47.0%LFM2.5-8B-A1B leads
Math
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash-LiteLFM2.5-8B-A1BResult
MATH-500Source 88.8%Not comparable
AIME 2025Source 42.5%Not comparable
AIME26Source 50.0%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash-LiteLFM2.5-8B-A1BResult
CharXivSource 73.2%Not comparable
AA-MMMU-ProSource 75.5%Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash-LiteLFM2.5-8B-A1BResult
AA-IFBenchSource 77.2%55.6%Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite leads
IFEvalSource 91.8%Not comparable
IFBenchSource 56.5%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite and LFM2.5-8B-A1B on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite and LFM2.5-8B-A1B today?

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite: $0.25 input / $1.50 output per 1M tokens LFM2.5-8B-A1B: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 16, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

A weekly brief for engineers and researchers covering new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.