Model comparison
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Head-to-head evidence from 17 shared benchmark results across 5 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Public leaderboard positions: Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite #111 (Supported); MiMo-V2.5-Pro #14 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite and MiMo-V2.5-Pro share 17 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 3 results are unique to Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite; 14 to MiMo-V2.5-Pro.
Updated July 21, 2026- Shared results
- 17
- Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite only
- 3
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro only
- 14
- Comparable categories
- 0 / 8
Benchmark data for Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite and MiMo-V2.5-Pro is coming soon on BenchLM.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 17 shared benchmark results across 5 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.
Category breakdown
Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.
| Category | Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite | Δ | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agentic | Gemini 3.1 Flash-LiteNot measured | MarginNo overlap | MiMo-V2.5-Pro68.4 |
| Coding | Gemini 3.1 Flash-LiteNot measured | MarginNo overlap | MiMo-V2.5-Pro57.2 |
| Knowledge | Gemini 3.1 Flash-LiteNot measured | MarginNo overlap | MiMo-V2.5-Pro48.0 |
| Multimodal | Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite73.2 | MarginNo overlap | MiMo-V2.5-ProNot measured |
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite$0.25 input / $1.5 output | MiMo-V2.5-ProNot available | A complete price comparison is not available. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite205 tok/s | MiMo-V2.5-ProNot available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite7.50 s | MiMo-V2.5-ProNot available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite1M | MiMo-V2.5-Pro1M | Listed context windows are equal. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic14 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Agentic IndexSource | 6.2% | 29.1% | MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads |
| APEX-Agents-AASource | 12.2% | 2.4% | Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite leads |
| τ²-bench resultsSource | 31.3% | 94.2% | MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads |
| GDPval-AASource | 7.1% | 38.3% | MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads |
| GDPval-AASource | 642 | 1265 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads |
| Gert LabsSource | 38.46% | 62.70% | MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads |
| Claw-EvalSource | — | 63.8% | Not comparable |
| τ³-bench resultsSource | — | 72.9% | Not comparable |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | — | 68.4% | Not comparable |
| AA BriefcaseSource | — | 873 | Not comparable |
| AA ITBenchSource | — | 38.2% | Not comparable |
| terminalBenchHardSource | — | 43.2% | Not comparable |
| aaTerminalBench21Source | — | 65.2% | Not comparable |
| AA Harvey LABSource | — | 73.3% | Not comparable |
Coding5 benchmarks
Reasoning2 benchmarks
Knowledge9 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | 25.0% | 42.2% | MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | 82.2% | 86.6% | MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads |
| AA-HLESource | 16.2% | 33.8% | MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | -15.5% | 3.6% | MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | 36.4% | 22.6% | Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite leads |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | 81.6% | 24.5% | MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads |
| HLESource | — | 48% | Not comparable |
| HLE w/o toolsSource | — | 34% | Not comparable |
| AA Openness IndexSource | — | 38.9% | Not comparable |
Multimodal3 benchmarks
Inst. Following1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-IFBenchSource | 77.2% | 79.9% | MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads |
Frequently Asked Questions (3)
Can I compare Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite and MiMo-V2.5-Pro on BenchLM yet?
Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.
Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?
BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.
What data is available for Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite and MiMo-V2.5-Pro today?
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite: $0.25 input / $1.50 output per 1M tokens MiMo-V2.5-Pro: Pricing unavailable Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.
Related Comparisons
Explore More
Choose a model with this week’s evidence
Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.
One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.