Skip to main content

Model comparison

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 15 shared benchmark results across 5 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

50.83/100
Margin
2.1pts
winning →
52.94/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite #111 (Supported); Nemotron 3 Nano 30B #98 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B share 15 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 5 results are unique to Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite; 0 to Nemotron 3 Nano 30B.

Updated July 20, 2026
Shared results
15
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite only
5
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B only
0
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 15 shared benchmark results across 5 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is priced at $0.25 input / $1.50 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Nemotron 3 Nano 30B. Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 32K for Nemotron 3 Nano 30B.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B
CategoryGemini 3.1 Flash-LiteΔNemotron 3 Nano 30B
MultimodalGemini 3.1 Flash-Lite73.2MarginNo overlapNemotron 3 Nano 30BNot measured

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGemini 3.1 Flash-LiteNemotron 3 Nano 30BComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGemini 3.1 Flash-Lite$0.25 input / $1.5 outputNemotron 3 Nano 30B$0 input / $0 outputNemotron 3 Nano 30B has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondGemini 3.1 Flash-Lite205 tok/sNemotron 3 Nano 30B152 tok/sGemini 3.1 Flash-Lite has the higher measured throughput.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGemini 3.1 Flash-Lite7.50 sNemotron 3 Nano 30B1.90 sNemotron 3 Nano 30B reaches the first token sooner.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGemini 3.1 Flash-Lite1MNemotron 3 Nano 30B32KGemini 3.1 Flash-Lite lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash-LiteNemotron 3 Nano 30BResult
AA Agentic IndexSource 6.2%2.0%Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite leads
APEX-Agents-AASource 12.2%Not comparable
τ²-bench resultsSource 31.3%40.9%Nemotron 3 Nano 30B leads
GDPval-AASource 7.1%0.0%Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite leads
GDPval-AASource 642484Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite leads
Gert LabsSource 38.46%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash-LiteNemotron 3 Nano 30BResult
Vibe Code BenchSource 0.00%Not comparable
AA Coding IndexSource 34.7%14.4%Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite leads
AA-SciCodeSource 41.9%29.6%Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite leads
Reasoning
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash-LiteNemotron 3 Nano 30BResult
AA-LCRSource 65.3%33.7%Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite leads
CritPtSource 1.1%0.9%Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite leads
Knowledge
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash-LiteNemotron 3 Nano 30BResult
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 25.0%14.2%Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 82.2%75.7%Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite leads
AA-HLESource 16.2%10.2%Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -15.5%-51.6%Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 36.4%17.1%Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 81.6%82.9%Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite leads
Multimodal
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash-LiteNemotron 3 Nano 30BResult
CharXivSource 73.2%Not comparable
AA-MMMU-ProSource 75.5%Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash-LiteNemotron 3 Nano 30BResult
AA-IFBenchSource 77.2%71.1%Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite leads
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B today?

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite: $0.25 input / $1.50 output per 1M tokens Nemotron 3 Nano 30B: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 20, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.