Model comparison
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs Inkling
Head-to-head evidence from 19 shared benchmark results across 5 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Public leaderboard positions: Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite unranked (Not scored); Inkling #20 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite and Inkling share 19 comparable benchmark results. 2 of 8 categories are comparable. 2 results are unique to Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite; 13 to Inkling.
Updated July 21, 2026- Shared results
- 19
- Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite only
- 2
- Inkling only
- 13
- Comparable categories
- 2 / 8
Treat this as a split decision. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite makes more sense if you want the cheaper token bill or you want the stronger reasoning-first profile; Inkling is the better fit if coding is the priority or you would rather avoid the extra latency and token burn of a reasoning model.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 19 shared benchmark results across 5 evidence categories; 2 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite and Inkling finish on the same BenchAlign overall score, so this is less about a single winner and more about where the edge shows up. The BenchAlign headline says tie; the benchmark table is where the real choice happens.
Inkling is also the more expensive model on tokens at $1.87 input / $4.68 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.30 input / $2.50 output per 1M tokens for Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is the reasoning model in the pair, while Inkling is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use.
Category breakdown
Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.
| Category | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite | Δ | Inkling |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite54.2 | Margin→ 14.4 | Inkling68.6 |
| Agentic | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite63.4 | Margin→ 6.0 | Inkling69.4 |
| Reasoning | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite72.2 | MarginNo overlap | InklingNot measured |
| Knowledge | Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteNot measured | MarginNo overlap | Inkling51.6 |
| Math | Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteNot measured | MarginNo overlap | Inkling97.1 |
| Multimodal | Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteNot measured | MarginNo overlap | Inkling76.5 |
| Inst. Following | Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteNot measured | MarginNo overlap | Inkling79.8 |
Decisive benchmark drivers
The largest measured benchmark gaps in this matchup, with exact reported values.
More
- Source ↗
Terminal-Bench 2.0
AgenticA 54%B 63.8%Winner: InklingΔ 9.8Terminal-Bench 2.0: Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite scored 54%; Inkling scored 63.8%. Inkling wins this benchmark. - Source ↗
SWE-bench Pro
CodingA 54.2%B 54.3%Winner: InklingΔ 0.1SWE-bench Pro: Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite scored 54.2%; Inkling scored 54.3%. Inkling wins this benchmark.
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite | Inkling | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite$0.3 input / $2.5 output | Inkling$1.87 input / $4.68 output | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite has the lower combined listed price. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteNot available | InklingNot available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteNot available | InklingNot available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite1M | Inkling1M | Listed context windows are equal. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
AgenticInkling wins10 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite | Inkling | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | 54% | 63.8% | Inkling leads |
| OSWorld-VerifiedSource | 74% | — | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | 1140 | 1239 | Inkling leads |
| AA Agentic IndexSource | 26.8% | 32.3% | Inkling leads |
| GDPval-AASource | 32.0% | 36.9% | Inkling leads |
| AA BriefcaseSource | 634 | 836 | Inkling leads |
| AA Tau3 BankingSource | 16.5% | 23.7% | Inkling leads |
| BrowseCompSource | — | 77.1% | Not comparable |
| MCP AtlasSource | — | 74.1% | Not comparable |
| Design Arena Agentic Web DevSource | — | 1257 | Not comparable |
CodingInkling wins5 benchmarks
Reasoning3 benchmarks
Knowledge10 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite | Inkling | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | 36.5% | 40.7% | Inkling leads |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | 83.8% | 87.2% | Inkling leads |
| AA-HLESource | 17.5% | 29.7% | Inkling leads |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | 6.9% | 2.1% | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite leads |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | 30.3% | 40.0% | Inkling leads |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | 33.5% | 63.1% | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite leads |
| GPQASource | — | 87.9% | Not comparable |
| GPQA-DSource | — | 87.9% | Not comparable |
| HLESource | — | 46% | Not comparable |
| HLE w/o toolsSource | — | 30% | Not comparable |
Math1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite | Inkling | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AIME26Source | — | 97.1% | Not comparable |
Multimodal4 benchmarks
Inst. Following1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite | Inkling | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| IFBenchSource | — | 79.8% | Not comparable |
Frequently Asked Questions (3)
Which is better, Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite or Inkling?
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite and Inkling are tied on the BenchAlign overall score, so the right pick depends on which category matters most for your use case.
Which is better for coding, Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite or Inkling?
Inkling has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 68.6 versus 54.2. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Which is better for agentic tasks, Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite or Inkling?
Inkling has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 69.4 versus 63.4. Inside this category, AA Briefcase is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Related Comparisons
Explore More
Choose a model with this week’s evidence
Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.
One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.