Model comparison
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs MiMo-V2-Omni
Head-to-head evidence from 10 shared benchmark results across 4 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Public leaderboard positions: Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite unranked (Not scored); MiMo-V2-Omni #40 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite and MiMo-V2-Omni share 10 comparable benchmark results. 1 of 8 categories are comparable. 11 results are unique to Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite; 4 to MiMo-V2-Omni.
Updated July 21, 2026- Shared results
- 10
- Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite only
- 11
- MiMo-V2-Omni only
- 4
- Comparable categories
- 1 / 8
Treat this as a split decision. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite makes more sense if you need the larger 1M context window; MiMo-V2-Omni is the better fit if coding is the priority.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 10 shared benchmark results across 4 evidence categories; 1 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite and MiMo-V2-Omni finish on the same BenchAlign overall score, so this is less about a single winner and more about where the edge shows up. The BenchAlign headline says tie; the benchmark table is where the real choice happens.
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 262K for MiMo-V2-Omni.
Category breakdown
Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.
| Category | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite | Δ | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite54.2 | Margin→ 20.6 | MiMo-V2-Omni74.8 |
| Agentic | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite63.4 | MarginNo overlap | MiMo-V2-OmniNot measured |
| Reasoning | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite72.2 | MarginNo overlap | MiMo-V2-OmniNot measured |
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite | MiMo-V2-Omni | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite$0.3 input / $2.5 output | MiMo-V2-OmniNot available | A complete price comparison is not available. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteNot available | MiMo-V2-OmniNot available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteNot available | MiMo-V2-OmniNot available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite1M | MiMo-V2-Omni262K | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic9 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite | MiMo-V2-Omni | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | 54% | — | Not comparable |
| OSWorld-VerifiedSource | 74% | — | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | 1140 | — | Not comparable |
| AA Agentic IndexSource | 26.8% | — | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | 32.0% | — | Not comparable |
| AA BriefcaseSource | 634 | — | Not comparable |
| AA Tau3 BankingSource | 16.5% | — | Not comparable |
| Claw-EvalSource | — | 45.2% | Not comparable |
| τ²-bench resultsSource | — | 91.2% | Not comparable |
CodingMiMo-V2-Omni wins5 benchmarks
Reasoning3 benchmarks
Knowledge6 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite | MiMo-V2-Omni | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | 36.5% | 35.0% | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite leads |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | 83.8% | 82.8% | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite leads |
| AA-HLESource | 17.5% | 19.9% | MiMo-V2-Omni leads |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | 6.9% | -17.4% | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite leads |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | 30.3% | 18.7% | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite leads |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | 33.5% | 44.4% | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite leads |
Multimodal1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite | MiMo-V2-Omni | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-MMMU-ProSource | 79.0% | 69.9% | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite leads |
Inst. Following1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite | MiMo-V2-Omni | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-IFBenchSource | — | 53.5% | Not comparable |
Frequently Asked Questions (2)
Which is better, Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite or MiMo-V2-Omni?
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite and MiMo-V2-Omni are tied on the BenchAlign overall score, so the right pick depends on which category matters most for your use case.
Which is better for coding, Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite or MiMo-V2-Omni?
MiMo-V2-Omni has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 74.8 versus 54.2. Inside this category, AA-SciCode is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Related Comparisons
Explore More
Choose a model with this week’s evidence
Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.
One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.