Model comparison
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs MiMo-V2-Pro
Head-to-head evidence from 9 shared benchmark results across 3 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Public leaderboard positions: Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite unranked (Not scored); MiMo-V2-Pro #17 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite and MiMo-V2-Pro share 9 comparable benchmark results. 1 of 8 categories are comparable. 12 results are unique to Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite; 6 to MiMo-V2-Pro.
Updated July 21, 2026- Shared results
- 9
- Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite only
- 12
- MiMo-V2-Pro only
- 6
- Comparable categories
- 1 / 8
Treat this as a split decision. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite makes more sense if its workflow fits your team better; MiMo-V2-Pro is the better fit if coding is the priority.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 9 shared benchmark results across 3 evidence categories; 1 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite and MiMo-V2-Pro finish on the same BenchAlign overall score, so this is less about a single winner and more about where the edge shows up. The BenchAlign headline says tie; the benchmark table is where the real choice happens.
Category breakdown
Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.
| Category | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite | Δ | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite54.2 | Margin→ 23.8 | MiMo-V2-Pro78.0 |
| Agentic | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite63.4 | MarginNo overlap | MiMo-V2-ProNot measured |
| Reasoning | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite72.2 | MarginNo overlap | MiMo-V2-ProNot measured |
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite | MiMo-V2-Pro | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite$0.3 input / $2.5 output | MiMo-V2-ProNot available | A complete price comparison is not available. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteNot available | MiMo-V2-ProNot available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteNot available | MiMo-V2-ProNot available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite1M | MiMo-V2-Pro1M | Listed context windows are equal. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic11 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite | MiMo-V2-Pro | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | 54% | — | Not comparable |
| OSWorld-VerifiedSource | 74% | — | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | 1140 | — | Not comparable |
| AA Agentic IndexSource | 26.8% | — | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | 32.0% | — | Not comparable |
| AA BriefcaseSource | 634 | — | Not comparable |
| AA Tau3 BankingSource | 16.5% | — | Not comparable |
| Claw-EvalSource | — | 57.8% | Not comparable |
| τ²-bench resultsSource | — | 95% | Not comparable |
| Gert LabsSource | — | 36.68% | Not comparable |
| ResearchClawBenchSource | — | 15.3% | Not comparable |
CodingMiMo-V2-Pro wins5 benchmarks
Reasoning3 benchmarks
Knowledge6 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite | MiMo-V2-Pro | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | 36.5% | 40.3% | MiMo-V2-Pro leads |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | 83.8% | 87.0% | MiMo-V2-Pro leads |
| AA-HLESource | 17.5% | 28.3% | MiMo-V2-Pro leads |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | 6.9% | 4.9% | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite leads |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | 30.3% | 26.8% | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite leads |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | 33.5% | 29.9% | MiMo-V2-Pro leads |
Multimodal1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite | MiMo-V2-Pro | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-MMMU-ProSource | 79.0% | — | Not comparable |
Inst. Following1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite | MiMo-V2-Pro | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-IFBenchSource | — | 68.8% | Not comparable |
Frequently Asked Questions (2)
Which is better, Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite or MiMo-V2-Pro?
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite and MiMo-V2-Pro are tied on the BenchAlign overall score, so the right pick depends on which category matters most for your use case.
Which is better for coding, Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite or MiMo-V2-Pro?
MiMo-V2-Pro has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 78 versus 54.2. Inside this category, AA-SciCode is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Related Comparisons
Explore More
Choose a model with this week’s evidence
Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.
One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.