Model comparison
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs Ornith-1.0-397B
Head-to-head evidence from 3 shared benchmark results across 2 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Evidence parity. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite and Ornith-1.0-397B share 3 comparable benchmark results. 2 of 8 categories are comparable. 18 results are unique to Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite; 4 to Ornith-1.0-397B.
Updated July 21, 2026- Shared results
- 3
- Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite only
- 18
- Ornith-1.0-397B only
- 4
- Comparable categories
- 2 / 8
Treat this as a split decision. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite makes more sense if you need the larger 1M context window; Ornith-1.0-397B is the better fit if coding is the priority or you want the cheaper token bill.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 3 shared benchmark results across 2 evidence categories; 2 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite and Ornith-1.0-397B finish on the same BenchAlign overall score, so this is less about a single winner and more about where the edge shows up. The BenchAlign headline says tie; the benchmark table is where the real choice happens.
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is also the more expensive model on tokens at $0.30 input / $2.50 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Ornith-1.0-397B. That is roughly Infinityx on output cost alone. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 256K for Ornith-1.0-397B.
Category breakdown
Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.
| Category | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite | Δ | Ornith-1.0-397B |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite54.2 | Margin→ 20.4 | Ornith-1.0-397B74.6 |
| Agentic | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite63.4 | Margin→ 14.1 | Ornith-1.0-397B77.5 |
| Reasoning | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite72.2 | MarginNo overlap | Ornith-1.0-397BNot measured |
Decisive benchmark drivers
The largest measured benchmark gaps in this matchup, with exact reported values.
More
- Source ↗
Terminal-Bench 2.0
AgenticA 54%B 77.5%Winner: Ornith-1.0-397BΔ 23.5Terminal-Bench 2.0: Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite scored 54%; Ornith-1.0-397B scored 77.5%. Ornith-1.0-397B wins this benchmark. - Source ↗
SWE-bench Pro
CodingA 54.2%B 62.2%Winner: Ornith-1.0-397BΔ 8SWE-bench Pro: Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite scored 54.2%; Ornith-1.0-397B scored 62.2%. Ornith-1.0-397B wins this benchmark.
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite | Ornith-1.0-397B | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite$0.3 input / $2.5 output | Ornith-1.0-397B$0 input / $0 output | Ornith-1.0-397B has the lower combined listed price. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteNot available | Ornith-1.0-397BNot available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteNot available | Ornith-1.0-397BNot available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite1M | Ornith-1.0-397B256K | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
AgenticOrnith-1.0-397B wins8 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite | Ornith-1.0-397B | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | 54% | 77.5% | Ornith-1.0-397B leads |
| OSWorld-VerifiedSource | 74% | — | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | 1140 | — | Not comparable |
| AA Agentic IndexSource | 26.8% | — | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | 32.0% | — | Not comparable |
| AA BriefcaseSource | 634 | — | Not comparable |
| AA Tau3 BankingSource | 16.5% | — | Not comparable |
| Claw-EvalSource | — | 77.1% | Not comparable |
CodingOrnith-1.0-397B wins7 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite | Ornith-1.0-397B | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | 54.0% | 77.5% | Ornith-1.0-397B leads |
| SWE-bench ProSource | 54.2% | 62.2% | Ornith-1.0-397B leads |
| AA Coding IndexSource | 49.3% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-SciCodeSource | 40.9% | — | Not comparable |
| SWE-bench VerifiedSource | — | 82.4% | Not comparable |
| SWE MultilingualSource | — | 78.9% | Not comparable |
| NL2RepoSource | — | 48.2% | Not comparable |
Reasoning3 benchmarks
Knowledge6 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite | Ornith-1.0-397B | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | 36.5% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | 83.8% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-HLESource | 17.5% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | 6.9% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | 30.3% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | 33.5% | — | Not comparable |
Multimodal1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite | Ornith-1.0-397B | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-MMMU-ProSource | 79.0% | — | Not comparable |
Frequently Asked Questions (3)
Which is better, Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite or Ornith-1.0-397B?
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite and Ornith-1.0-397B are tied on the BenchAlign overall score, so the right pick depends on which category matters most for your use case.
Which is better for coding, Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite or Ornith-1.0-397B?
Ornith-1.0-397B has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 74.6 versus 54.2. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Which is better for agentic tasks, Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite or Ornith-1.0-397B?
Ornith-1.0-397B has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 77.5 versus 63.4. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Related Comparisons
Explore More
Choose a model with this week’s evidence
Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.
One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.