Skip to main content

Model comparison

Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Holo3-35B-A3B

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 1 shared benchmark result across 1 category. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

N/A
No comparison
H Company
N/A
1 category wins0 category wins

Evidence parity. Gemini 3.6 Flash and Holo3-35B-A3B share 1 comparable benchmark result. 1 of 8 categories are comparable. 18 results are unique to Gemini 3.6 Flash; 0 to Holo3-35B-A3B.

Updated July 21, 2026
Shared results
1
Gemini 3.6 Flash only
18
Holo3-35B-A3B only
0
Comparable categories
1 / 8

Treat this as a split decision. Gemini 3.6 Flash makes more sense if agentic is the priority or you need the larger 1M context window; Holo3-35B-A3B is the better fit if you would rather avoid the extra latency and token burn of a reasoning model.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 1 shared benchmark result across 1 evidence category; 1 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

Gemini 3.6 Flash and Holo3-35B-A3B finish on the same BenchAlign overall score, so this is less about a single winner and more about where the edge shows up. The BenchAlign headline says tie; the benchmark table is where the real choice happens.

Gemini 3.6 Flash is the reasoning model in the pair, while Holo3-35B-A3B is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use. Gemini 3.6 Flash gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 64K for Holo3-35B-A3B.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for Gemini 3.6 Flash and Holo3-35B-A3B
CategoryGemini 3.6 FlashΔHolo3-35B-A3B
AgenticGemini 3.6 Flash83.0Margin 0.4Holo3-35B-A3B82.6

Decisive benchmark drivers

The largest measured benchmark gaps in this matchup, with exact reported values.

More
A · Gemini 3.6 FlashB · Holo3-35B-A3B
  1. OSWorld-Verified

    Agentic
    Source ↗
    A 83%B 82.6%
    Winner: Gemini 3.6 FlashΔ 0.4
    OSWorld-Verified: Gemini 3.6 Flash scored 83%; Holo3-35B-A3B scored 82.6%. Gemini 3.6 Flash wins this benchmark.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGemini 3.6 FlashHolo3-35B-A3BComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGemini 3.6 Flash$1.5 input / $7.5 outputHolo3-35B-A3BNot availableA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondGemini 3.6 FlashNot availableHolo3-35B-A3BNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGemini 3.6 FlashNot availableHolo3-35B-A3BNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGemini 3.6 Flash1MHolo3-35B-A3B64KGemini 3.6 Flash lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

AgenticGemini 3.6 Flash wins
BenchmarkGemini 3.6 FlashHolo3-35B-A3BResult
OSWorld-VerifiedSource 83%82.6%Gemini 3.6 Flash leads
GDPval-AASource 1421Not comparable
AA Agentic IndexSource 38.7%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 46.1%Not comparable
AA BriefcaseSource 961Not comparable
AA Tau3 BankingSource 24.5%Not comparable
aaTerminalBench21Source 77.5%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkGemini 3.6 FlashHolo3-35B-A3BResult
deepSweSource 49%Not comparable
AA Coding IndexSource 69.2%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 52.7%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkGemini 3.6 FlashHolo3-35B-A3BResult
AA-LCRSource 69.7%Not comparable
CritPtSource 10.6%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkGemini 3.6 FlashHolo3-35B-A3BResult
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 50.1%Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 92.8%Not comparable
AA-HLESource 38.3%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience IndexSource 23.5%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 50.2%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 53.5%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkGemini 3.6 FlashHolo3-35B-A3BResult
AA-MMMU-ProSource 83.2%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (2)

Which is better, Gemini 3.6 Flash or Holo3-35B-A3B?

Gemini 3.6 Flash and Holo3-35B-A3B are tied on the BenchAlign overall score, so the right pick depends on which category matters most for your use case.

Which is better for agentic tasks, Gemini 3.6 Flash or Holo3-35B-A3B?

Gemini 3.6 Flash has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 83 versus 82.6. Inside this category, OSWorld-Verified is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 21, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.