Side-by-side benchmark comparison across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, and math workflows.
Gemini 3 Flash
66
3/8 categoriesQwen3.5-122B-A10B
71
Winner · 4/8 categoriesGemini 3 Flash· Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
Pick Qwen3.5-122B-A10B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Gemini 3 Flash only becomes the better choice if reasoning is the priority or you need the larger 1M context window.
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is clearly ahead on the aggregate, 71 to 66. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B's sharpest advantage is in coding, where it averages 76.3 against 45. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is LiveCodeBench, 36% to 78.9%. Gemini 3 Flash does hit back in reasoning, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.
Gemini 3 Flash is also the more expensive model on tokens at $0.50 input / $3.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Qwen3.5-122B-A10B. That is roughly Infinityx on output cost alone. Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is the reasoning model in the pair, while Gemini 3 Flash is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use. Gemini 3 Flash gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 262K for Qwen3.5-122B-A10B.
BenchLM keeps the benchmark table and the operator tradeoffs on the same page so a better score does not hide a materially slower, pricier, or smaller-context model.
Runtime metrics show N/A when BenchLM does not have a sourced snapshot for that exact model. The scoring rules and freshness policy are documented on the methodology page.
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Flash | Qwen3.5-122B-A10B |
|---|---|---|
| AgenticGemini 3 Flash wins | ||
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | 56% | 49.4% |
| BrowseComp | 66% | 63.8% |
| OSWorld-Verified | 53% | 58% |
| tau2-bench | — | 79.5% |
| CodingQwen3.5-122B-A10B wins | ||
| HumanEval | 62% | — |
| SWE-bench Verified | 44% | 72% |
| LiveCodeBench | 36% | 78.9% |
| SWE-bench Pro | 44% | — |
| SWE-Rebench | 52.5% | — |
| Multimodal & GroundedGemini 3 Flash wins | ||
| MMMU-Pro | 80% | 76.9% |
| OfficeQA Pro | 79% | — |
| ReasoningGemini 3 Flash wins | ||
| MuSR | 65% | — |
| BBH | 84% | — |
| LongBench v2 | 75% | 60.2% |
| MRCRv2 | 76% | — |
| KnowledgeQwen3.5-122B-A10B wins | ||
| MMLU | 70% | — |
| GPQA | 69% | 86.6% |
| SuperGPQA | 67% | 67.1% |
| MMLU-Pro | 72% | 86.7% |
| HLE | 6% | — |
| FrontierScience | 65% | — |
| SimpleQA | 67% | — |
| Instruction FollowingQwen3.5-122B-A10B wins | ||
| IFEval | 85% | 93.4% |
| MultilingualQwen3.5-122B-A10B wins | ||
| MGSM | 85% | — |
| MMLU-ProX | 78% | 82.2% |
| Mathematics | ||
| AIME 2023 | 70% | — |
| AIME 2024 | 72% | — |
| AIME 2025 | 71% | — |
| HMMT Feb 2023 | 66% | — |
| HMMT Feb 2024 | 68% | — |
| HMMT Feb 2025 | 67% | — |
| BRUMO 2025 | 69% | — |
| MATH-500 | 80% | — |
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is ahead overall, 71 to 66. The biggest single separator in this matchup is LiveCodeBench, where the scores are 36% and 78.9%.
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 81.6 versus 54. Inside this category, GPQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 76.3 versus 45. Inside this category, LiveCodeBench is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Gemini 3 Flash has the edge for reasoning in this comparison, averaging 72.7 versus 60.2. Inside this category, LongBench v2 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Gemini 3 Flash has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 57.5 versus 56. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Gemini 3 Flash has the edge for multimodal and grounded tasks in this comparison, averaging 79.6 versus 76.9. Inside this category, MMMU-Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B has the edge for instruction following in this comparison, averaging 93.4 versus 85. Inside this category, IFEval is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B has the edge for multilingual tasks in this comparison, averaging 82.2 versus 80.5. Inside this category, MMLU-ProX is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.