Skip to main content

Model comparison

Gemini 3 Pro vs Kimi K2.7 Code

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 11 shared benchmark results across 5 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

66.85/100
Margin
12.8pts
← winning
Moonshot AI
54.03/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Gemini 3 Pro #21 (Supported); Kimi K2.7 Code #92 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Gemini 3 Pro and Kimi K2.7 Code share 11 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 16 results are unique to Gemini 3 Pro; 12 to Kimi K2.7 Code.

Updated July 27, 2026
Shared results
11
Gemini 3 Pro only
16
Kimi K2.7 Code only
12
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Gemini 3 Pro and Kimi K2.7 Code is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 11 shared benchmark results across 5 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Gemini 3 Pro is priced at $2.00 input / $12.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.95 input / $4.00 output per 1M tokens for Kimi K2.7 Code. Gemini 3 Pro has the larger context window at 2M, compared with 256K for Kimi K2.7 Code.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for Gemini 3 Pro and Kimi K2.7 Code
CategoryGemini 3 ProΔKimi K2.7 Code
ReasoningGemini 3 Pro31.1MarginNo overlapKimi K2.7 CodeNot measured
MathGemini 3 Pro32.9MarginNo overlapKimi K2.7 CodeNot measured
MultimodalGemini 3 Pro81.1MarginNo overlapKimi K2.7 CodeNot measured

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGemini 3 ProKimi K2.7 CodeComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGemini 3 Pro$2 input / $12 outputKimi K2.7 Code$0.95 input / $4 outputKimi K2.7 Code has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondGemini 3 Pro109 tok/sKimi K2.7 CodeNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGemini 3 Pro32.65 sKimi K2.7 CodeNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGemini 3 Pro2MKimi K2.7 Code256KGemini 3 Pro lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkGemini 3 ProKimi K2.7 CodeResult
τ²-bench resultsSource 87.1%90.1%Kimi K2.7 Code leads
Gert LabsSource 63.23%Not comparable
JobBenchSource 11.4%Not comparable
Kimi Claw 24/7Source 46.9%Not comparable
MCP AtlasSource 76%Not comparable
MCP Mark VerifiedSource 81.1%Not comparable
AA Agentic IndexSource 29.6%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 34.3%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 1186Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkGemini 3 ProKimi K2.7 CodeResult
Vibe Code BenchSource 14.30%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 56.1%47.5%Gemini 3 Pro leads
AA LiveCodeBenchSource 91.7%Not comparable
Kimi Code Bench v2Source 62.0%Not comparable
ProgramBenchSource 53.6%Not comparable
MLS-Bench LiteSource 35.1%Not comparable
cursorBench32Source 49.7%Not comparable
AA Coding IndexSource 60.8%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkGemini 3 ProKimi K2.7 CodeResult
ARC-AGI-2Source 31.1%Not comparable
AA-LCRSource 70.7%66.3%Gemini 3 Pro leads
CritPtSource 9.1%10.0%Kimi K2.7 Code leads
Knowledge
BenchmarkGemini 3 ProKimi K2.7 CodeResult
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 39.5%42.0%Kimi K2.7 Code leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 90.8%89.6%Gemini 3 Pro leads
AA-HLESource 37.2%32.8%Gemini 3 Pro leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource 15.8%-10.7%Gemini 3 Pro leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 55.9%38.6%Gemini 3 Pro leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 90.9%80.3%Kimi K2.7 Code leads
AA MMLU-ProSource 89.8%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkGemini 3 ProKimi K2.7 CodeResult
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 37.600%Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)Source 18.750%Not comparable
Multilingual
BenchmarkGemini 3 ProKimi K2.7 CodeResult
AA Global-MMLU-LiteSource 92.2%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkGemini 3 ProKimi K2.7 CodeResult
MMMU-ProSource 81%Not comparable
MathVisionSource 86.6%Not comparable
VideoMMMUSource 87.6%Not comparable
ScreenSpot ProSource 72.7%Not comparable
CharXivSource 81.4%Not comparable
V*Source 88.0%Not comparable
AA-MMMU-ProSource 80.2%Not comparable
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1300Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkGemini 3 ProKimi K2.7 CodeResult
AA-IFBenchSource 70.4%63.1%Gemini 3 Pro leads
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Gemini 3 Pro and Kimi K2.7 Code on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Gemini 3 Pro and Kimi K2.7 Code today?

Gemini 3 Pro: $2.00 input / $12.00 output per 1M tokens Kimi K2.7 Code: $0.95 input / $4.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Self-host vs API cost

Estimates at 50,000 req/day · 1000 tokens/req average.

Gemini 3 Pro
API / mo$10,500
Self-host / moNot listed
Break-even
Proprietary model — self-hosting not applicable.
Kimi K2.7 Code
API / mo$3,713
Self-host / mo$18,221
Break-even326M/day
Model the full break-even

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 27, 2026

Know when it’s worth switching models

The model to choose, the cheaper alternative, and the release we would wait on.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.