Model comparison
Gemini 3 Pro vs Nemotron 3 Ultra
Head-to-head evidence from 12 shared benchmark results across 5 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Verified leaderboard positions: Gemini 3 Pro unranked; Nemotron 3 Ultra #24
BenchAlign evidence: Gemini 3 Pro supported; Nemotron 3 Ultra not scored. Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. Gemini 3 Pro and Nemotron 3 Ultra share 12 comparable benchmark results. 1 of 8 categories are comparable. 16 results are unique to Gemini 3 Pro; 27 to Nemotron 3 Ultra.
Updated July 16, 2026- Shared results
- 12
- Gemini 3 Pro only
- 16
- Nemotron 3 Ultra only
- 27
- Comparable categories
- 1 / 8
Pick Gemini 3 Pro if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Nemotron 3 Ultra only becomes the better choice if reasoning is the priority or you want the cheaper token bill.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 12 shared benchmark results across 5 evidence categories; 1 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
Gemini 3 Pro is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 79 to 60. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
Gemini 3 Pro is also the more expensive model on tokens at $2.00 input / $12.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Nemotron 3 Ultra. That is roughly Infinityx on output cost alone. Nemotron 3 Ultra is the reasoning model in the pair, while Gemini 3 Pro is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use. Gemini 3 Pro gives you the larger context window at 2M, compared with 1M for Nemotron 3 Ultra.
Category breakdown
Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.
| Category | Gemini 3 Pro | Δ | Nemotron 3 Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reasoning | Gemini 3 Pro31.1 | Margin→ 30.8 | Nemotron 3 Ultra61.9 |
| Agentic | Gemini 3 ProNot measured | MarginNo overlap | Nemotron 3 Ultra51.3 |
| Coding | Gemini 3 ProNot measured | MarginNo overlap | Nemotron 3 Ultra58.3 |
| Knowledge | Gemini 3 ProNot measured | MarginNo overlap | Nemotron 3 Ultra54.2 |
| Math | Gemini 3 Pro32.9 | MarginNo overlap | Nemotron 3 UltraNot measured |
| Multilingual | Gemini 3 ProNot measured | MarginNo overlap | Nemotron 3 Ultra83.0 |
| Multimodal | Gemini 3 Pro81.1 | MarginNo overlap | Nemotron 3 UltraNot measured |
| Inst. Following | Gemini 3 ProNot measured | MarginNo overlap | Nemotron 3 Ultra81.7 |
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | Gemini 3 Pro | Nemotron 3 Ultra | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | Gemini 3 Pro$2 input / $12 output | Nemotron 3 Ultra$0 input / $0 output | Nemotron 3 Ultra has the lower combined listed price. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | Gemini 3 Pro109 tok/s | Nemotron 3 UltraNot available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | Gemini 3 Pro32.65 s | Nemotron 3 UltraNot available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | Gemini 3 Pro2M | Nemotron 3 Ultra1M | Gemini 3 Pro lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic14 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Pro | Nemotron 3 Ultra | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| τ²-bench resultsSource | 87.1% | 83.3% | Gemini 3 Pro leads |
| Gert LabsSource | 63.23% | — | Not comparable |
| JobBenchSource | 11.4% | — | Not comparable |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | — | 56.4% | Not comparable |
| PinchBenchSource | — | 90.0% | Not comparable |
| BrowseCompSource | — | 44.4% | Not comparable |
| τ³-bench resultsSource | — | 70.9% | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | — | 33.2% | Not comparable |
| HLE w/ toolsSource | — | 37.4% | Not comparable |
| AA Agentic IndexSource | — | 27.4% | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | — | 1164 | Not comparable |
| AA BriefcaseSource | — | 870 | Not comparable |
| AA EnterpriseOps-GymSource | — | 28.9% | Not comparable |
| AA Harvey LABSource | — | 3.3% | Not comparable |
Coding10 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Pro | Nemotron 3 Ultra | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vibe Code BenchSource | 14.30% | — | Not comparable |
| Terminal-Bench HardSource | 41.7% | 36.4% | Gemini 3 Pro leads |
| AA-SciCodeSource | 56.1% | 39.9% | Gemini 3 Pro leads |
| AA LiveCodeBenchSource | 91.7% | — | Not comparable |
| SWE-bench VerifiedSource | — | 71.9% | Not comparable |
| SWE MultilingualSource | — | 67.7% | Not comparable |
| LiveCodeBench v6Source | — | 89.0% | Not comparable |
| SciCodeSource | — | 44.6% | Not comparable |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | — | 56.4% | Not comparable |
| AA Coding IndexSource | — | 49.3% | Not comparable |
ReasoningNemotron 3 Ultra wins4 benchmarks
Knowledge13 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Pro | Nemotron 3 Ultra | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | 39.5% | 37.8% | Gemini 3 Pro leads |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | 90.8% | 86.7% | Gemini 3 Pro leads |
| AA-HLESource | 37.2% | 26.6% | Gemini 3 Pro leads |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | 15.8% | -0.8% | Gemini 3 Pro leads |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | 55.9% | 21.6% | Gemini 3 Pro leads |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | 90.9% | 28.5% | Nemotron 3 Ultra leads |
| AA MMLU-ProSource | 89.8% | — | Not comparable |
| GPQASource | — | 87% | Not comparable |
| GPQA-DSource | — | 87.0% | Not comparable |
| HLESource | — | 26.7% | Not comparable |
| HLE w/o toolsSource | — | 26.7% | Not comparable |
| MMLU-ProSource | — | 86.8% | Not comparable |
| AA Openness IndexSource | — | 83.3% | Not comparable |
Math2 benchmarks
Multilingual2 benchmarks
Multimodal8 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Pro | Nemotron 3 Ultra | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMMU-ProSource | 81% | — | Not comparable |
| MathVisionSource | 86.6% | — | Not comparable |
| VideoMMMUSource | 87.6% | — | Not comparable |
| ScreenSpot ProSource | 72.7% | — | Not comparable |
| CharXivSource | 81.4% | — | Not comparable |
| V*Source | 88.0% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-MMMU-ProSource | 80.2% | — | Not comparable |
| Design Arena WebsiteSource | — | 1132 | Not comparable |
Frequently Asked Questions (2)
Which is better, Gemini 3 Pro or Nemotron 3 Ultra?
Gemini 3 Pro is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 79 to 60.
Which is better for reasoning, Gemini 3 Pro or Nemotron 3 Ultra?
Nemotron 3 Ultra has the edge for reasoning in this comparison, averaging 61.9 versus 31.1. Inside this category, CritPt is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Related Comparisons
Explore More
The AI models change fast. We track them for you.
A weekly brief for engineers and researchers covering new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.