Head-to-head comparison across 2benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
Gemini 3 Pro
83
Qwen3.5 397B
66
Verified leaderboard positions: Gemini 3 Pro unranked · Qwen3.5 397B #11
Pick Gemini 3 Pro if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Qwen3.5 397B only becomes the better choice if reasoning is the priority.
Reasoning
+32.1 difference
Multimodal
+2.0 difference
Gemini 3 Pro
Qwen3.5 397B
$null / $null
$0 / $0
109 t/s
96 t/s
32.65s
2.44s
2M
128K
Pick Gemini 3 Pro if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Qwen3.5 397B only becomes the better choice if reasoning is the priority.
Gemini 3 Pro is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 83 to 66. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
Gemini 3 Pro's sharpest advantage is in multimodal & grounded, where it averages 81 against 79. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is MMMU-Pro, 81% to 79%. Qwen3.5 397B does hit back in reasoning, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.
Gemini 3 Pro gives you the larger context window at 2M, compared with 128K for Qwen3.5 397B.
Gemini 3 Pro is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 83 to 66. The biggest single separator in this matchup is MMMU-Pro, where the scores are 81% and 79%.
Qwen3.5 397B has the edge for reasoning in this comparison, averaging 63.2 versus 31.1. Gemini 3 Pro stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.
Gemini 3 Pro has the edge for multimodal and grounded tasks in this comparison, averaging 81 versus 79. Inside this category, V* is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.