Skip to main content

Model comparison

Gemma 3 27B vs Mistral Large 3

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 16 shared benchmark results across 6 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

41.57/100
Margin
8.8pts
winning →
50.4/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Gemma 3 27B #164 (Supported); Mistral Large 3 #113 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Gemma 3 27B and Mistral Large 3 share 16 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 0 results are unique to Gemma 3 27B; 0 to Mistral Large 3.

Updated July 20, 2026
Shared results
16
Gemma 3 27B only
0
Mistral Large 3 only
0
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Gemma 3 27B and Mistral Large 3 is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 16 shared benchmark results across 6 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Mistral Large 3 is priced at $0.50 input / $1.50 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Gemma 3 27B. Mistral Large 3 has the larger context window at 128K, compared with 32K for Gemma 3 27B.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGemma 3 27BMistral Large 3Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGemma 3 27B$0 input / $0 outputMistral Large 3$0.5 input / $1.5 outputGemma 3 27B has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondGemma 3 27B31 tok/sMistral Large 348 tok/sMistral Large 3 has the higher measured throughput.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGemma 3 27B2.04 sMistral Large 31.04 sMistral Large 3 reaches the first token sooner.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGemma 3 27B32KMistral Large 3128KMistral Large 3 lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BMistral Large 3Result
AA Agentic IndexSource 0.3%5.5%Mistral Large 3 leads
τ²-bench resultsSource 10.5%24.6%Mistral Large 3 leads
GDPval-AASource 0.0%6.6%Mistral Large 3 leads
GDPval-AASource -144633Mistral Large 3 leads
Coding
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BMistral Large 3Result
AA Coding IndexSource 10.1%20.1%Mistral Large 3 leads
AA-SciCodeSource 21.2%36.2%Mistral Large 3 leads
Reasoning
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BMistral Large 3Result
AA-LCRSource 5.7%34.7%Mistral Large 3 leads
CritPtSource 0.0%0.0%Tie
Knowledge
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BMistral Large 3Result
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 7.4%15.9%Mistral Large 3 leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 42.8%68.0%Mistral Large 3 leads
AA-HLESource 4.7%4.1%Gemma 3 27B leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -65.9%-39.4%Mistral Large 3 leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 12.5%24.1%Mistral Large 3 leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 89.5%83.7%Mistral Large 3 leads
Multimodal
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BMistral Large 3Result
AA-MMMU-ProSource 48.0%55.7%Mistral Large 3 leads
Inst. Following
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BMistral Large 3Result
AA-IFBenchSource 31.8%36.2%Mistral Large 3 leads
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Gemma 3 27B and Mistral Large 3 on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Gemma 3 27B and Mistral Large 3 today?

Gemma 3 27B: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Mistral Large 3: $0.50 input / $1.50 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Self-host vs API cost

Estimates at 50,000 req/day · 1000 tokens/req average.

Gemma 3 27B
API / mo$0
Self-host / moNot listed
Break-even
Proprietary model — self-hosting not applicable.
Mistral Large 3
API / mo$1,500
Self-host / mo$9,110
Break-even380M/day
Model the full break-even

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 20, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.