Model comparison
Gemma 4 12B vs Grok Code Fast 1
Head-to-head evidence from 11 shared benchmark results across 5 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Public leaderboard positions: Gemma 4 12B #137 (Estimated); Grok Code Fast 1 #180 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. Gemma 4 12B and Grok Code Fast 1 share 11 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 12 results are unique to Gemma 4 12B; 1 to Grok Code Fast 1.
Updated July 23, 2026- Shared results
- 11
- Gemma 4 12B only
- 12
- Grok Code Fast 1 only
- 1
- Comparable categories
- 0 / 8
Benchmark data for Gemma 4 12B and Grok Code Fast 1 is coming soon on BenchLM.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 11 shared benchmark results across 5 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.
Category breakdown
Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.
| Category | Gemma 4 12B | Δ | Grok Code Fast 1 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | Gemma 4 12BNot measured | MarginNo overlap | Grok Code Fast 170.8 |
| Reasoning | Gemma 4 12B43.4 | MarginNo overlap | Grok Code Fast 1Not measured |
| Knowledge | Gemma 4 12B77.5 | MarginNo overlap | Grok Code Fast 1Not measured |
| Math | Gemma 4 12B77.5 | MarginNo overlap | Grok Code Fast 1Not measured |
| Multimodal | Gemma 4 12B69.1 | MarginNo overlap | Grok Code Fast 1Not measured |
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | Gemma 4 12B | Grok Code Fast 1 | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | Gemma 4 12BNot available | Grok Code Fast 1$0.2 input / $1.5 output | A complete price comparison is not available. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | Gemma 4 12BNot available | Grok Code Fast 1172 tok/s | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | Gemma 4 12BNot available | Grok Code Fast 12.81 s | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | Gemma 4 12B256K | Grok Code Fast 1256K | Listed context windows are equal. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 12B | Grok Code Fast 1 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| τ²-bench resultsSource | 36.3% | 75.7% | Grok Code Fast 1 leads |
Coding2 benchmarks
Reasoning4 benchmarks
Knowledge11 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 12B | Grok Code Fast 1 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQASource | 78.8% | — | Not comparable |
| GPQA-DSource | 78.8% | — | Not comparable |
| MMLU-ProSource | 77.2% | — | Not comparable |
| HLE w/o toolsSource | 5.2% | — | Not comparable |
| MMMLUSource | 83.4% | — | Not comparable |
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | 22.0% | 21.6% | Gemma 4 12B leads |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | 75.3% | 72.7% | Gemma 4 12B leads |
| AA-HLESource | 14.8% | 7.5% | Gemma 4 12B leads |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | -51.9% | -36.0% | Grok Code Fast 1 leads |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | 16.0% | 23.8% | Grok Code Fast 1 leads |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | 80.8% | 78.5% | Grok Code Fast 1 leads |
Math1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 12B | Grok Code Fast 1 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AIME26Source | 77.5% | — | Not comparable |
Multimodal4 benchmarks
Inst. Following1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 12B | Grok Code Fast 1 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-IFBenchSource | 73.5% | 41.4% | Gemma 4 12B leads |
Frequently Asked Questions (3)
Can I compare Gemma 4 12B and Grok Code Fast 1 on BenchLM yet?
Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.
Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?
BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.
What data is available for Gemma 4 12B and Grok Code Fast 1 today?
Grok Code Fast 1: $0.20 input / $1.50 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.
Related Comparisons
Explore More
Choose a model with this week’s evidence
Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.
One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.