Skip to main content

Gemma 4 12B vs Hy3 Preview

Head-to-head comparison across 2benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

Gemma 4 12B

53

VS

Hy3 Preview

60

2 categoriesvs0 categories

Pick Hy3 Preview if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Gemma 4 12B only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Coding

Gemma 4 12B
72vs60

+12.0 difference

Knowledge

Gemma 4 12B
77.8vs46.7

+31.1 difference

Operational Comparison

Gemma 4 12B

Hy3 Preview

Price (per 1M tokens)

N/A

$0 / $0

Speed

N/A

N/A

Latency (TTFT)

N/A

N/A

Context Window

256K

256K

Quick Verdict

Pick Hy3 Preview if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Gemma 4 12B only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority.

Hy3 Preview is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 60 to 53. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Which is better, Gemma 4 12B or Hy3 Preview?

Hy3 Preview is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 60 to 53. The biggest single separator in this matchup is GPQA, where the scores are 78.8% and 87.2%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Gemma 4 12B or Hy3 Preview?

Gemma 4 12B has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 77.8 versus 46.7. Inside this category, GPQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, Gemma 4 12B or Hy3 Preview?

Gemma 4 12B has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 72 versus 60. Hy3 Preview stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: June 8, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.