Skip to main content

Gemma 4 12B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

Head-to-head comparison across 4benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

Gemma 4 12B

53

VS

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

64

0 categoriesvs3 categories

Verified leaderboard positions: Gemma 4 12B unranked · Qwen3.5-122B-A10B #12

Pick Qwen3.5-122B-A10B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Gemma 4 12B only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Coding

Tie
72vs72

Reasoning

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
43.4vs60.2

+16.8 difference

Knowledge

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
77.8vs81.6

+3.8 difference

Multimodal

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
69.1vs77.2

+8.1 difference

Operational Comparison

Gemma 4 12B

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

Price (per 1M tokens)

N/A

$0 / $0

Speed

N/A

N/A

Latency (TTFT)

N/A

N/A

Context Window

256K

262K

Quick Verdict

Pick Qwen3.5-122B-A10B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Gemma 4 12B only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 64 to 53. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B's sharpest advantage is in reasoning, where it averages 60.2 against 43.4. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is MMLU-Pro, 77.2% to 86.7%.

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B gives you the larger context window at 262K, compared with 256K for Gemma 4 12B.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (5)

Which is better, Gemma 4 12B or Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 64 to 53. The biggest single separator in this matchup is MMLU-Pro, where the scores are 77.2% and 86.7%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Gemma 4 12B or Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 81.6 versus 77.8. Inside this category, MMLU-Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, Gemma 4 12B or Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?

Gemma 4 12B and Qwen3.5-122B-A10B are effectively tied for coding here, both landing at 72 on average.

Which is better for reasoning, Gemma 4 12B or Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B has the edge for reasoning in this comparison, averaging 60.2 versus 43.4. Gemma 4 12B stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.

Which is better for multimodal and grounded tasks, Gemma 4 12B or Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B has the edge for multimodal and grounded tasks in this comparison, averaging 77.2 versus 69.1. Inside this category, MathVision is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: June 8, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.