Skip to main content

Gemma 4 31B vs GLM-5.1

Head-to-head comparison across 2benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

Gemma 4 31B

65

VS

GLM-5.1

83

1 categoriesvs1 categories

Verified leaderboard positions: Gemma 4 31B unranked · GLM-5.1 #23

Pick GLM-5.1 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Gemma 4 31B only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority or you want the cheaper token bill.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Coding

GLM-5.1
41.6vs60.9

+19.3 difference

Knowledge

Gemma 4 31B
61.3vs52.3

+9.0 difference

Operational Comparison

Gemma 4 31B

GLM-5.1

Price (per 1M tokens)

$0 / $0

$1.4 / $4.4

Speed

N/A

N/A

Latency (TTFT)

N/A

N/A

Context Window

256K

203K

Quick Verdict

Pick GLM-5.1 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Gemma 4 31B only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority or you want the cheaper token bill.

GLM-5.1 is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 83 to 65. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

GLM-5.1's sharpest advantage is in coding, where it averages 60.9 against 41.6. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is HLE, 26.5% to 52.3%. Gemma 4 31B does hit back in knowledge, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.

GLM-5.1 is also the more expensive model on tokens at $1.40 input / $4.40 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Gemma 4 31B. That is roughly Infinityx on output cost alone. Gemma 4 31B gives you the larger context window at 256K, compared with 203K for GLM-5.1.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Which is better, Gemma 4 31B or GLM-5.1?

GLM-5.1 is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 83 to 65. The biggest single separator in this matchup is HLE, where the scores are 26.5% and 52.3%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Gemma 4 31B or GLM-5.1?

Gemma 4 31B has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 61.3 versus 52.3. Inside this category, HLE is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, Gemma 4 31B or GLM-5.1?

GLM-5.1 has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 60.9 versus 41.6. Inside this category, SWE-Rebench is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Self-host vs API cost

Estimates at 50,000 req/day · 1000 tokens/req average.

Gemma 4 31B
API / mo$0
Self-host / mo$429
Break-even
GLM-5.1
API / mo$4,350
Self-host / mo$18,221
Break-even264M/day
Model the full break-even

Related Comparisons

Last updated: May 20, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.