Head-to-head comparison across 1benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
Gemma 4 E4B
36
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
64
Verified leaderboard positions: Gemma 4 E4B unranked · Qwen3.5-122B-A10B #10
Pick Qwen3.5-122B-A10B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Gemma 4 E4B only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.
Knowledge
+16.0 difference
Gemma 4 E4B
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
$0 / $0
$0 / $0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
128K
262K
Pick Qwen3.5-122B-A10B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Gemma 4 E4B only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 64 to 36. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B's sharpest advantage is in knowledge, where it averages 81.6 against 65.6. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is GPQA, 58.6% to 86.6%.
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B gives you the larger context window at 262K, compared with 128K for Gemma 4 E4B.
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 64 to 36. The biggest single separator in this matchup is GPQA, where the scores are 58.6% and 86.6%.
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 81.6 versus 65.6. Inside this category, GPQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.