Skip to main content

Model comparison

GLM-4.5-Air vs o3

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 12 shared benchmark results across 6 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

47.7/100
Margin
0.2pts
winning →
OpenAI
47.89/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: GLM-4.5-Air #133 (Supported); o3 #131 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. GLM-4.5-Air and o3 share 12 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 0 results are unique to GLM-4.5-Air; 4 to o3.

Updated July 22, 2026
Shared results
12
GLM-4.5-Air only
0
o3 only
4
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for GLM-4.5-Air and o3 is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 12 shared benchmark results across 6 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

o3 is priced at $2.00 input / $8.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.20 input / $1.10 output per 1M tokens for GLM-4.5-Air. o3 has the larger context window at 200K, compared with 128K for GLM-4.5-Air.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for GLM-4.5-Air and o3
CategoryGLM-4.5-AirΔo3
MathGLM-4.5-AirNot measuredMarginNo overlapo314.5

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGLM-4.5-Airo3Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGLM-4.5-Air$0.2 input / $1.1 outputo3$2 input / $8 outputGLM-4.5-Air has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondGLM-4.5-Air106 tok/so3118 tok/so3 has the higher measured throughput.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGLM-4.5-Air1.18 so35.38 sGLM-4.5-Air reaches the first token sooner.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGLM-4.5-Air128Ko3200Ko3 lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkGLM-4.5-Airo3Result
τ²-bench resultsSource 46.5%80.7%o3 leads
Coding
BenchmarkGLM-4.5-Airo3Result
AA-SciCodeSource 30.6%41.0%o3 leads
Reasoning
BenchmarkGLM-4.5-Airo3Result
AA-LCRSource 43.7%69.3%o3 leads
CritPtSource 0.0%1.1%o3 leads
Knowledge
BenchmarkGLM-4.5-Airo3Result
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 16.5%30.4%o3 leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 73.3%82.7%o3 leads
AA-HLESource 6.8%20.0%o3 leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -62.5%-15.3%o3 leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 15.5%38.4%o3 leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 92.3%87.1%o3 leads
Math
BenchmarkGLM-4.5-Airo3Result
AA MATH-500Source 99.2%Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 18.685%Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)Source 2.083%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkGLM-4.5-Airo3Result
Design Arena WebsiteSource 11761067GLM-4.5-Air leads
AA-MMMU-ProSource 70.1%Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkGLM-4.5-Airo3Result
AA-IFBenchSource 37.6%71.4%o3 leads
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare GLM-4.5-Air and o3 on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for GLM-4.5-Air and o3 today?

GLM-4.5-Air: $0.20 input / $1.10 output per 1M tokens o3: $2.00 input / $8.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 22, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.