Side-by-side benchmark comparison across knowledge, coding, math, and reasoning.
GPT-4.1 is clearly ahead on the aggregate, 43 to 38. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
GPT-4.1's sharpest advantage is in knowledge, where it averages 78.3 against 32.2. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is MMLU, 90.2 to 37. GLM-4.5 does hit back in mathematics, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.
GPT-4.1 gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 128K for GLM-4.5.
Pick GPT-4.1 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. GLM-4.5 only becomes the better choice if mathematics is the priority.
GPT-4.1
78.3
GLM-4.5
32.2
GPT-4.1
54.6
GLM-4.5
20
GPT-4.1
26.4
GLM-4.5
38.6
GPT-4.1
87.4
GLM-4.5
68
GPT-4.1 is ahead overall, 43 to 38. The biggest single separator in this matchup is MMLU, where the scores are 90.2 and 37.
GPT-4.1 has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 78.3 versus 32.2. Inside this category, MMLU is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
GPT-4.1 has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 54.6 versus 20. Inside this category, SWE-bench Verified is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
GLM-4.5 has the edge for math in this comparison, averaging 38.6 versus 26.4. Inside this category, AIME 2024 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
GPT-4.1 has the edge for instruction following in this comparison, averaging 87.4 versus 68. Inside this category, IFEval is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.