Skip to main content

Model comparison

GLM-4.6 vs Grok Code Fast 1

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 11 shared benchmark results across 5 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

55.12/100
Margin
16.5pts
← winning
38.64/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: GLM-4.6 #85 (Supported); Grok Code Fast 1 #180 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. GLM-4.6 and Grok Code Fast 1 share 11 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 3 results are unique to GLM-4.6; 1 to Grok Code Fast 1.

Updated July 23, 2026
Shared results
11
GLM-4.6 only
3
Grok Code Fast 1 only
1
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for GLM-4.6 and Grok Code Fast 1 is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 11 shared benchmark results across 5 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Grok Code Fast 1 has the larger context window at 256K, compared with 200K for GLM-4.6.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for GLM-4.6 and Grok Code Fast 1
CategoryGLM-4.6ΔGrok Code Fast 1
CodingGLM-4.6Not measuredMarginNo overlapGrok Code Fast 170.8
MathGLM-4.63.4MarginNo overlapGrok Code Fast 1Not measured

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGLM-4.6Grok Code Fast 1Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGLM-4.6Not availableGrok Code Fast 1$0.2 input / $1.5 outputA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondGLM-4.6Not availableGrok Code Fast 1172 tok/sA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGLM-4.6Not availableGrok Code Fast 12.81 sA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGLM-4.6200KGrok Code Fast 1256KGrok Code Fast 1 lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkGLM-4.6Grok Code Fast 1Result
τ²-bench resultsSource 76.9%75.7%GLM-4.6 leads
Coding
BenchmarkGLM-4.6Grok Code Fast 1Result
Vibe Code BenchSource 3.09%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 33.1%36.2%Grok Code Fast 1 leads
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 70.8%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkGLM-4.6Grok Code Fast 1Result
AA-LCRSource 26.3%48.3%Grok Code Fast 1 leads
CritPtSource 0.0%0.0%Tie
Knowledge
BenchmarkGLM-4.6Grok Code Fast 1Result
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 23.0%21.6%GLM-4.6 leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 63.2%72.7%Grok Code Fast 1 leads
AA-HLESource 5.2%7.5%Grok Code Fast 1 leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -31.6%-36.0%GLM-4.6 leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 20.8%23.8%Grok Code Fast 1 leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 66.1%78.5%GLM-4.6 leads
Math
BenchmarkGLM-4.6Grok Code Fast 1Result
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 3.819%Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)Source 2.128%Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkGLM-4.6Grok Code Fast 1Result
AA-IFBenchSource 36.7%41.4%Grok Code Fast 1 leads
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare GLM-4.6 and Grok Code Fast 1 on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for GLM-4.6 and Grok Code Fast 1 today?

Grok Code Fast 1: $0.20 input / $1.50 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 23, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.